Instruction Makes a Difference

Fuente: arXiv
Salvato in:
Dettagli Bibliografici
Autori principali: Adewumi, Tosin, Habib, Nudrat, Alkhaled, Lama, Barney, Elisa
Natura: Preprint
Pubblicazione: 2024
Soggetti:
Accesso online:
Tags: Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
_version_ 1866911914929422336
author Adewumi, Tosin
Habib, Nudrat
Alkhaled, Lama
Barney, Elisa
author_facet Adewumi, Tosin
Habib, Nudrat
Alkhaled, Lama
Barney, Elisa
contents We introduce Instruction Document Visual Question Answering (iDocVQA) dataset and Large Language Document (LLaDoc) model, for training Language-Vision (LV) models for document analysis and predictions on document images, respectively. Usually, deep neural networks for the DocVQA task are trained on datasets lacking instructions. We show that using instruction-following datasets improves performance. We compare performance across document-related datasets using the recent state-of-the-art (SotA) Large Language and Vision Assistant (LLaVA)1.5 as the base model. We also evaluate the performance of the derived models for object hallucination using the Polling-based Object Probing Evaluation (POPE) dataset. The results show that instruction-tuning performance ranges from 11X to 32X of zero-shot performance and from 0.1% to 4.2% over non-instruction (traditional task) finetuning. Despite the gains, these still fall short of human performance (94.36%), implying there's much room for improvement.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2402_00453
institution arXiv
publishDate 2024
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Instruction Makes a Difference
Adewumi, Tosin
Habib, Nudrat
Alkhaled, Lama
Barney, Elisa
Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
Computation and Language
We introduce Instruction Document Visual Question Answering (iDocVQA) dataset and Large Language Document (LLaDoc) model, for training Language-Vision (LV) models for document analysis and predictions on document images, respectively. Usually, deep neural networks for the DocVQA task are trained on datasets lacking instructions. We show that using instruction-following datasets improves performance. We compare performance across document-related datasets using the recent state-of-the-art (SotA) Large Language and Vision Assistant (LLaVA)1.5 as the base model. We also evaluate the performance of the derived models for object hallucination using the Polling-based Object Probing Evaluation (POPE) dataset. The results show that instruction-tuning performance ranges from 11X to 32X of zero-shot performance and from 0.1% to 4.2% over non-instruction (traditional task) finetuning. Despite the gains, these still fall short of human performance (94.36%), implying there's much room for improvement.
title Instruction Makes a Difference
topic Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
Computation and Language
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.00453