Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Wang, Zihan, Li, Yunxuan, Wu, Yuexin, Luo, Liangchen, Hou, Le, Yu, Hongkun, Shang, Jingbo
Format: Preprint
Published: 2024
Subjects:
Online Access:https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.02658
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866914972061138944
author Wang, Zihan
Li, Yunxuan
Wu, Yuexin
Luo, Liangchen
Hou, Le
Yu, Hongkun
Shang, Jingbo
author_facet Wang, Zihan
Li, Yunxuan
Wu, Yuexin
Luo, Liangchen
Hou, Le
Yu, Hongkun
Shang, Jingbo
contents Process supervision, using a trained verifier to evaluate the intermediate steps generated by a reasoner, has demonstrated significant improvements in multi-step problem solving. In this paper, to avoid the expensive effort of human annotation on the verifier training data, we introduce Model-induced Process Supervision (MiPS), a novel method for automating data curation. MiPS annotates an intermediate step by sampling completions of this solution through the reasoning model, and obtaining an accuracy defined as the proportion of correct completions. Inaccuracies of the reasoner would cause MiPS underestimating the accuracy of intermediate steps, therefore, we suggest and empirically show that verification focusing on high predicted scores of the verifier shall be preferred over that of low predicted scores, contrary to prior observations on human curated data. Our approach significantly improves the performance of PaLM 2 on math and coding tasks (accuracy +0.67% on GSM8K, +4.16% on MATH, +0.92% on MBPP compared with an output supervision trained verifier). Additionally, our study demonstrates that the verifier exhibits strong generalization ability across different reasoning models.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2402_02658
institution arXiv
publishDate 2024
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Multi-step Problem Solving Through a Verifier: An Empirical Analysis on Model-induced Process Supervision
Wang, Zihan
Li, Yunxuan
Wu, Yuexin
Luo, Liangchen
Hou, Le
Yu, Hongkun
Shang, Jingbo
Artificial Intelligence
Computation and Language
Machine Learning
Process supervision, using a trained verifier to evaluate the intermediate steps generated by a reasoner, has demonstrated significant improvements in multi-step problem solving. In this paper, to avoid the expensive effort of human annotation on the verifier training data, we introduce Model-induced Process Supervision (MiPS), a novel method for automating data curation. MiPS annotates an intermediate step by sampling completions of this solution through the reasoning model, and obtaining an accuracy defined as the proportion of correct completions. Inaccuracies of the reasoner would cause MiPS underestimating the accuracy of intermediate steps, therefore, we suggest and empirically show that verification focusing on high predicted scores of the verifier shall be preferred over that of low predicted scores, contrary to prior observations on human curated data. Our approach significantly improves the performance of PaLM 2 on math and coding tasks (accuracy +0.67% on GSM8K, +4.16% on MATH, +0.92% on MBPP compared with an output supervision trained verifier). Additionally, our study demonstrates that the verifier exhibits strong generalization ability across different reasoning models.
title Multi-step Problem Solving Through a Verifier: An Empirical Analysis on Model-induced Process Supervision
topic Artificial Intelligence
Computation and Language
Machine Learning
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.02658