Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Crenshaw, John Franklin, Connolly, Andrew J., Meyers, Joshua E., Kalmbach, J. Bryce, Homar, Guillem Megias, Ribeiro, Tiago, Suberlak, Krzysztof, Thomas, Sandrine, Tsai, Te-wei
Format: Preprint
Published: 2024
Subjects:
Online Access:https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.08094
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866911776174505984
author Crenshaw, John Franklin
Connolly, Andrew J.
Meyers, Joshua E.
Kalmbach, J. Bryce
Homar, Guillem Megias
Ribeiro, Tiago
Suberlak, Krzysztof
Thomas, Sandrine
Tsai, Te-wei
author_facet Crenshaw, John Franklin
Connolly, Andrew J.
Meyers, Joshua E.
Kalmbach, J. Bryce
Homar, Guillem Megias
Ribeiro, Tiago
Suberlak, Krzysztof
Thomas, Sandrine
Tsai, Te-wei
contents The Vera C. Rubin Observatory will, over a period of 10 years, repeatedly survey the southern sky. To ensure that images generated by Rubin meet the quality requirements for precision science, the observatory will use an Active Optics System (AOS) to correct for alignment and mirror surface perturbations introduced by gravity and temperature gradients in the optical system. To accomplish this Rubin will use out-of-focus images from sensors located at the edge of the focal plane to learn and correct for perturbations to the wavefront. We have designed and integrated a deep learning model for wavefront estimation into the AOS pipeline. In this paper, we compare the performance of this deep learning approach to Rubin's baseline algorithm when applied to images from two different simulations of the Rubin optical system. We show the deep learning approach is faster and more accurate, achieving the atmospheric error floor both for high-quality images, and low-quality images with heavy blending and vignetting. Compared to the baseline algorithm, the deep learning model is 40x faster, the median error 2x better under ideal conditions, 5x better in the presence of vignetting by the Rubin camera, and 14x better in the presence of blending in crowded fields. In addition, the deep learning model surpasses the required optical quality in simulations of the AOS closed loop. This system promises to increase the survey area useful for precision science by up to 8%. We discuss how this system might be deployed when commissioning and operating Rubin.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2402_08094
institution arXiv
publishDate 2024
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Using AI for Wavefront Estimation with the Rubin Observatory Active Optics System
Crenshaw, John Franklin
Connolly, Andrew J.
Meyers, Joshua E.
Kalmbach, J. Bryce
Homar, Guillem Megias
Ribeiro, Tiago
Suberlak, Krzysztof
Thomas, Sandrine
Tsai, Te-wei
Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics
The Vera C. Rubin Observatory will, over a period of 10 years, repeatedly survey the southern sky. To ensure that images generated by Rubin meet the quality requirements for precision science, the observatory will use an Active Optics System (AOS) to correct for alignment and mirror surface perturbations introduced by gravity and temperature gradients in the optical system. To accomplish this Rubin will use out-of-focus images from sensors located at the edge of the focal plane to learn and correct for perturbations to the wavefront. We have designed and integrated a deep learning model for wavefront estimation into the AOS pipeline. In this paper, we compare the performance of this deep learning approach to Rubin's baseline algorithm when applied to images from two different simulations of the Rubin optical system. We show the deep learning approach is faster and more accurate, achieving the atmospheric error floor both for high-quality images, and low-quality images with heavy blending and vignetting. Compared to the baseline algorithm, the deep learning model is 40x faster, the median error 2x better under ideal conditions, 5x better in the presence of vignetting by the Rubin camera, and 14x better in the presence of blending in crowded fields. In addition, the deep learning model surpasses the required optical quality in simulations of the AOS closed loop. This system promises to increase the survey area useful for precision science by up to 8%. We discuss how this system might be deployed when commissioning and operating Rubin.
title Using AI for Wavefront Estimation with the Rubin Observatory Active Optics System
topic Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.08094