Is Epistemic Uncertainty Faithfully Represented by Evidential Deep Learning Methods?
Fuente:
arXiv
Gespeichert in:
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Veröffentlicht: |
2024
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| _version_ | 1866916386485305344 |
|---|---|
| author | Jürgens, Mira Meinert, Nis Bengs, Viktor Hüllermeier, Eyke Waegeman, Willem |
| author_facet | Jürgens, Mira Meinert, Nis Bengs, Viktor Hüllermeier, Eyke Waegeman, Willem |
| contents | Trustworthy ML systems should not only return accurate predictions, but also a reliable representation of their uncertainty. Bayesian methods are commonly used to quantify both aleatoric and epistemic uncertainty, but alternative approaches, such as evidential deep learning methods, have become popular in recent years. The latter group of methods in essence extends empirical risk minimization (ERM) for predicting second-order probability distributions over outcomes, from which measures of epistemic (and aleatoric) uncertainty can be extracted. This paper presents novel theoretical insights of evidential deep learning, highlighting the difficulties in optimizing second-order loss functions and interpreting the resulting epistemic uncertainty measures. With a systematic setup that covers a wide range of approaches for classification, regression and counts, it provides novel insights into issues of identifiability and convergence in second-order loss minimization, and the relative (rather than absolute) nature of epistemic uncertainty measures. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2402_09056 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2024 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Is Epistemic Uncertainty Faithfully Represented by Evidential Deep Learning Methods? Jürgens, Mira Meinert, Nis Bengs, Viktor Hüllermeier, Eyke Waegeman, Willem Artificial Intelligence Machine Learning Trustworthy ML systems should not only return accurate predictions, but also a reliable representation of their uncertainty. Bayesian methods are commonly used to quantify both aleatoric and epistemic uncertainty, but alternative approaches, such as evidential deep learning methods, have become popular in recent years. The latter group of methods in essence extends empirical risk minimization (ERM) for predicting second-order probability distributions over outcomes, from which measures of epistemic (and aleatoric) uncertainty can be extracted. This paper presents novel theoretical insights of evidential deep learning, highlighting the difficulties in optimizing second-order loss functions and interpreting the resulting epistemic uncertainty measures. With a systematic setup that covers a wide range of approaches for classification, regression and counts, it provides novel insights into issues of identifiability and convergence in second-order loss minimization, and the relative (rather than absolute) nature of epistemic uncertainty measures. |
| title | Is Epistemic Uncertainty Faithfully Represented by Evidential Deep Learning Methods? |
| topic | Artificial Intelligence Machine Learning |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.09056 |