When Do Off-Policy and On-Policy Policy Gradient Methods Align?

Fuente: arXiv
Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Mambelli, Davide, Bongers, Stephan, Zoeter, Onno, Spaan, Matthijs T. J., Oliehoek, Frans A.
Format: Preprint
Veröffentlicht: 2024
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
_version_ 1866929248185352192
author Mambelli, Davide
Bongers, Stephan
Zoeter, Onno
Spaan, Matthijs T. J.
Oliehoek, Frans A.
author_facet Mambelli, Davide
Bongers, Stephan
Zoeter, Onno
Spaan, Matthijs T. J.
Oliehoek, Frans A.
contents Policy gradient methods are widely adopted reinforcement learning algorithms for tasks with continuous action spaces. These methods succeeded in many application domains, however, because of their notorious sample inefficiency their use remains limited to problems where fast and accurate simulations are available. A common way to improve sample efficiency is to modify their objective function to be computable from off-policy samples without importance sampling. A well-established off-policy objective is the excursion objective. This work studies the difference between the excursion objective and the traditional on-policy objective, which we refer to as the on-off gap. We provide the first theoretical analysis showing conditions to reduce the on-off gap while establishing empirical evidence of shortfalls arising when these conditions are not met.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2402_12034
institution arXiv
publishDate 2024
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle When Do Off-Policy and On-Policy Policy Gradient Methods Align?
Mambelli, Davide
Bongers, Stephan
Zoeter, Onno
Spaan, Matthijs T. J.
Oliehoek, Frans A.
Machine Learning
Policy gradient methods are widely adopted reinforcement learning algorithms for tasks with continuous action spaces. These methods succeeded in many application domains, however, because of their notorious sample inefficiency their use remains limited to problems where fast and accurate simulations are available. A common way to improve sample efficiency is to modify their objective function to be computable from off-policy samples without importance sampling. A well-established off-policy objective is the excursion objective. This work studies the difference between the excursion objective and the traditional on-policy objective, which we refer to as the on-off gap. We provide the first theoretical analysis showing conditions to reduce the on-off gap while establishing empirical evidence of shortfalls arising when these conditions are not met.
title When Do Off-Policy and On-Policy Policy Gradient Methods Align?
topic Machine Learning
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.12034