Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2024
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.12384 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866910336394723328 |
|---|---|
| author | Wee, Benjamin |
| author_facet | Wee, Benjamin |
| contents | Simulation Based Calibration (SBC) is applied to analyse two commonly used, competing Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithms for estimating the posterior distribution of a stochastic volatility model. In particular, the bespoke 'off-set mixture approximation' algorithm proposed by Kim, Shephard, and Chib (1998) is explored together with a Hamiltonian Monte Carlo algorithm implemented through Stan. The SBC analysis involves a simulation study to assess whether each sampling algorithm has the capacity to produce valid inference for the correctly specified model, while also characterising statistical efficiency through the effective sample size. Results show that Stan's No-U-Turn sampler, an implementation of Hamiltonian Monte Carlo, produces a well-calibrated posterior estimate while the celebrated off-set mixture approach is less efficient and poorly calibrated, though model parameterisation also plays a role. Limitations and restrictions of generality are discussed. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2402_12384 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2024 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Comparing MCMC algorithms in Stochastic Volatility Models using Simulation Based Calibration Wee, Benjamin Applications Econometrics Simulation Based Calibration (SBC) is applied to analyse two commonly used, competing Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithms for estimating the posterior distribution of a stochastic volatility model. In particular, the bespoke 'off-set mixture approximation' algorithm proposed by Kim, Shephard, and Chib (1998) is explored together with a Hamiltonian Monte Carlo algorithm implemented through Stan. The SBC analysis involves a simulation study to assess whether each sampling algorithm has the capacity to produce valid inference for the correctly specified model, while also characterising statistical efficiency through the effective sample size. Results show that Stan's No-U-Turn sampler, an implementation of Hamiltonian Monte Carlo, produces a well-calibrated posterior estimate while the celebrated off-set mixture approach is less efficient and poorly calibrated, though model parameterisation also plays a role. Limitations and restrictions of generality are discussed. |
| title | Comparing MCMC algorithms in Stochastic Volatility Models using Simulation Based Calibration |
| topic | Applications Econometrics |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.12384 |