Light Bridges and Solar Active Region Evolution Processes
Fuente:
arXiv
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2024
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866913238413737984 |
|---|---|
| author | Li, Fuyu Rao, Changhui Zhao, Xinhua Guo, Yang Gong, Xiaoying Chen, Yuhao Xiang, Nanbin Wang, Huaning |
| author_facet | Li, Fuyu Rao, Changhui Zhao, Xinhua Guo, Yang Gong, Xiaoying Chen, Yuhao Xiang, Nanbin Wang, Huaning |
| contents | The formation mechanism of light bridges (LBs) is strongly related to the dynamic evolution of solar active regions (ARs). To study the relationship between LB formation and AR evolution phases, we employ 109 LB samples from 69 ARs in 2014 using observational data from the Helioseismic and Magnetic Imager on board the Solar Dynamics Observatory (HMI/SDO). LBs are well matched with the weak field lanes (WFLs), except that aligned on the polarity inversion line of δ sunspots. For penumbral intrusion (type-A) and umbral-dot emergence (type-C) LBs, the WFLs represent the splitting of magnetic flux systems. The sunspots tend to decay and split into several parts after type-A and type-C LBs formed. For sunspot/umbra merging (type-B) LBs, the WFLs declining are caused by collisions of flux systems. The sunspots merge and keep stable after type-B LBs formed. We conclude that type-B LBs are formed by collisions of flux systems, while type-A and type-C LBs are generated by splits. The time differences (δT) between LBs appearing and ARs peaking have average value of 1.06, -1.60, 1.82 for type-A, B, C LBs, with the standard deviation of 3.27, 2.17, 1.89, respectively. A positive value of δT means that the LB appear after AR peaking, whereas a minus δT before the peak. Type-A LBs trend to form in the decaying phase or around the peak time. Type-B LBs are more likely to be formed in the developing phase. Type-C LBs mostly take shape in the decaying phase of ARs. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2402_13455 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2024 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Light Bridges and Solar Active Region Evolution Processes Li, Fuyu Rao, Changhui Zhao, Xinhua Guo, Yang Gong, Xiaoying Chen, Yuhao Xiang, Nanbin Wang, Huaning Solar and Stellar Astrophysics The formation mechanism of light bridges (LBs) is strongly related to the dynamic evolution of solar active regions (ARs). To study the relationship between LB formation and AR evolution phases, we employ 109 LB samples from 69 ARs in 2014 using observational data from the Helioseismic and Magnetic Imager on board the Solar Dynamics Observatory (HMI/SDO). LBs are well matched with the weak field lanes (WFLs), except that aligned on the polarity inversion line of δ sunspots. For penumbral intrusion (type-A) and umbral-dot emergence (type-C) LBs, the WFLs represent the splitting of magnetic flux systems. The sunspots tend to decay and split into several parts after type-A and type-C LBs formed. For sunspot/umbra merging (type-B) LBs, the WFLs declining are caused by collisions of flux systems. The sunspots merge and keep stable after type-B LBs formed. We conclude that type-B LBs are formed by collisions of flux systems, while type-A and type-C LBs are generated by splits. The time differences (δT) between LBs appearing and ARs peaking have average value of 1.06, -1.60, 1.82 for type-A, B, C LBs, with the standard deviation of 3.27, 2.17, 1.89, respectively. A positive value of δT means that the LB appear after AR peaking, whereas a minus δT before the peak. Type-A LBs trend to form in the decaying phase or around the peak time. Type-B LBs are more likely to be formed in the developing phase. Type-C LBs mostly take shape in the decaying phase of ARs. |
| title | Light Bridges and Solar Active Region Evolution Processes |
| topic | Solar and Stellar Astrophysics |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.13455 |