Measuring Bargaining Abilities of LLMs: A Benchmark and A Buyer-Enhancement Method

Fuente: arXiv
Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Xia, Tian, He, Zhiwei, Ren, Tong, Miao, Yibo, Zhang, Zhuosheng, Yang, Yang, Wang, Rui
Format: Preprint
Published: 2024
Subjects:
Online Access:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866913375912460288
author Xia, Tian
He, Zhiwei
Ren, Tong
Miao, Yibo
Zhang, Zhuosheng
Yang, Yang
Wang, Rui
author_facet Xia, Tian
He, Zhiwei
Ren, Tong
Miao, Yibo
Zhang, Zhuosheng
Yang, Yang
Wang, Rui
contents Bargaining is an important and unique part of negotiation between humans. As LLM-driven agents learn to negotiate and act like real humans, how to evaluate agents' bargaining abilities remains an open problem. For the first time, we formally described the Bargaining task as an asymmetric incomplete information game, defining the gains of the Buyer and Seller in multiple bargaining processes. It allows us to quantitatively assess an agent's performance in the Bargain task. We collected a real product price dataset, AmazonHistoryPrice, and conducted evaluations of various LLM agents' bargaining abilities. We find that playing a Buyer is much harder than a Seller, and increasing model size can not effectively improve the Buyer's performance. To address the challenge, we propose a novel approach called OG-Narrator that integrates a deterministic Offer Generator to control the price range of Buyer's offers, and an LLM Narrator to create natural language sentences for generated offers. Experimental results show that OG-Narrator improves the buyer's deal rates from 26.67% to 88.88% and brings a ten times multiplication of profits on all baselines, even a model that has not been aligned.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2402_15813
institution arXiv
publishDate 2024
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Measuring Bargaining Abilities of LLMs: A Benchmark and A Buyer-Enhancement Method
Xia, Tian
He, Zhiwei
Ren, Tong
Miao, Yibo
Zhang, Zhuosheng
Yang, Yang
Wang, Rui
Computation and Language
Computer Science and Game Theory
Bargaining is an important and unique part of negotiation between humans. As LLM-driven agents learn to negotiate and act like real humans, how to evaluate agents' bargaining abilities remains an open problem. For the first time, we formally described the Bargaining task as an asymmetric incomplete information game, defining the gains of the Buyer and Seller in multiple bargaining processes. It allows us to quantitatively assess an agent's performance in the Bargain task. We collected a real product price dataset, AmazonHistoryPrice, and conducted evaluations of various LLM agents' bargaining abilities. We find that playing a Buyer is much harder than a Seller, and increasing model size can not effectively improve the Buyer's performance. To address the challenge, we propose a novel approach called OG-Narrator that integrates a deterministic Offer Generator to control the price range of Buyer's offers, and an LLM Narrator to create natural language sentences for generated offers. Experimental results show that OG-Narrator improves the buyer's deal rates from 26.67% to 88.88% and brings a ten times multiplication of profits on all baselines, even a model that has not been aligned.
title Measuring Bargaining Abilities of LLMs: A Benchmark and A Buyer-Enhancement Method
topic Computation and Language
Computer Science and Game Theory
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.15813