Quantile Outcome Adaptive Lasso: Covariate Selection for Inverse Probability Weighting Estimator of Quantile Treatment Effects
Fuente:
arXiv
Guardado en:
| Autores principales: | , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Preprint |
| Publicado: |
2024
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| _version_ | 1866913246067294208 |
|---|---|
| author | Shoji, Takehiro Tsuchida, Jun Yadohisa, Hiroshi |
| author_facet | Shoji, Takehiro Tsuchida, Jun Yadohisa, Hiroshi |
| contents | When using the propensity score method to estimate the treatment effects, it is important to select the covariates to be included in the propensity score model. The inclusion of covariates unrelated to the outcome in the propensity score model led to bias and large variance in the estimator of treatment effects. Many data-driven covariate selection methods have been proposed for selecting covariates related to outcomes. However, most of them assume an average treatment effect estimation and may not be designed to estimate quantile treatment effects (QTE), which is the effect of treatment on the quantiles of outcome distribution. In QTE estimation, we consider two relation types with the outcome as the expected value and quantile point. To achieve this, we propose a data-driven covariate selection method for propensity score models that allows for the selection of covariates related to the expected value and quantile of the outcome for QTE estimation. Assuming the quantile regression model as an outcome regression model, covariate selection was performed using a regularization method with the partial regression coefficients of the quantile regression model as weights. The proposed method was applied to artificial data and a dataset of mothers and children born in King County, Washington, to compare the performance of existing methods and QTE estimators. As a result, the proposed method performs well in the presence of covariates related to both the expected value and quantile of the outcome. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2402_18185 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2024 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Quantile Outcome Adaptive Lasso: Covariate Selection for Inverse Probability Weighting Estimator of Quantile Treatment Effects Shoji, Takehiro Tsuchida, Jun Yadohisa, Hiroshi Methodology When using the propensity score method to estimate the treatment effects, it is important to select the covariates to be included in the propensity score model. The inclusion of covariates unrelated to the outcome in the propensity score model led to bias and large variance in the estimator of treatment effects. Many data-driven covariate selection methods have been proposed for selecting covariates related to outcomes. However, most of them assume an average treatment effect estimation and may not be designed to estimate quantile treatment effects (QTE), which is the effect of treatment on the quantiles of outcome distribution. In QTE estimation, we consider two relation types with the outcome as the expected value and quantile point. To achieve this, we propose a data-driven covariate selection method for propensity score models that allows for the selection of covariates related to the expected value and quantile of the outcome for QTE estimation. Assuming the quantile regression model as an outcome regression model, covariate selection was performed using a regularization method with the partial regression coefficients of the quantile regression model as weights. The proposed method was applied to artificial data and a dataset of mothers and children born in King County, Washington, to compare the performance of existing methods and QTE estimators. As a result, the proposed method performs well in the presence of covariates related to both the expected value and quantile of the outcome. |
| title | Quantile Outcome Adaptive Lasso: Covariate Selection for Inverse Probability Weighting Estimator of Quantile Treatment Effects |
| topic | Methodology |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.18185 |