Imagen de Portada

A Randomized Controlled Trial on Anonymizing Reviewers to Each Other in Peer Review Discussions

Fuente: arXiv

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Rastogi, Charvi, Song, Xiangchen, Jin, Zhijing, Stelmakh, Ivan, Daumé III, Hal, Zhang, Kun, Shah, Nihar B.
Formato:	Preprint
Publicado:	2024
Materias:	Computers and Society Digital Libraries
Acceso en línea:	Acceder al recurso
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

Ejemplares similares

Causal Effect of Group Diversity on Redundancy and Coverage in Peer-Reviewing
por: Goyal, Navita, et al.
Publicado: (2024)

Peer Reviews of Peer Reviews: A Randomized Controlled Trial and Other Experiments
por: Goldberg, Alexander, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

To ArXiv or not to ArXiv: A Study Quantifying Pros and Cons of Posting Preprints Online
por: Rastogi, Charvi, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

A Gold Standard Dataset for the Reviewer Assignment Problem
por: Stelmakh, Ivan, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Detecting LLM-Generated Peer Reviews
por: Rao, Vishisht, et al.
Publicado: (2025)

ML Researchers Support Openness in Peer Review But Are Concerned About Resubmission Bias
por: Rao, Vishisht, et al.
Publicado: (2025)

Identity Theft in AI Conference Peer Review
por: Shah, Nihar B., et al.
Publicado: (2025)

Enhancing Peer Review in Astronomy: A Machine Learning and Optimization Approach to Reviewer Assignments for ALMA
por: Carpenter, John M., et al.
Publicado: (2024)

Gender and Discipline Shape Length, Content and Tone of Grant Peer Review Reports
por: Müller, Stefan, et al.
Publicado: (2025)

Commitment Checklist: Auditing Author Commitments in Peer Review
por: Chen, Chung-Chi, et al.
Publicado: (2026)

ICLR Points: How Many ICLR Publications Is One Paper in Each Area?
por: Luo, Zhongtang
Publicado: (2025)

Pre-review to Peer review: Pitfalls of Automating Reviews using Large Language Models
por: Akella, Akhil Pandey, et al.
Publicado: (2025)

DecentPeeR: A Self-Incentivised & Inclusive Decentralized Peer Review System
por: Gruendler, Johannes, et al.
Publicado: (2024)

A Principled Approach to Randomized Selection under Uncertainty: Applications to Peer Review and Grant Funding
por: Goldberg, Alexander, et al.
Publicado: (2025)

Rethinking Review Citations: Impact on Scientific Integrity
por: Aguilar-Ruiz, Jesus S.
Publicado: (2025)

Vulnerability of Text-Matching in ML/AI Conference Reviewer Assignments to Collusions
por: Hsieh, Jhih-Yi, et al.
Publicado: (2024)

AI Governance in the Context of the EU AI Act: A Bibliometric and Literature Review Approach
por: Kim, Byeong-Je, et al.
Publicado: (2025)

LLM-Generated or Human-Written? Comparing Review and Non-Review Papers on ArXiv
por: Elazar, Yanai, et al.
Publicado: (2026)

The Literature Review Network: An Explainable Artificial Intelligence for Systematic Literature Reviews, Meta-analyses, and Method Development
por: Morriss, Joshua, et al.
Publicado: (2024)

What Does Information Science Offer for Data Science Research?: A Review of Data and Information Ethics Literature
por: Lund, Brady D., et al.
Publicado: (2025)

More Parameters Than Populations: A Systematic Literature Review of Large Language Models within Survey Research
por: Buskirk, Trent D., et al.
Publicado: (2025)

On The Peer Review Reports: Does Size Matter?
por: Maddi, Abdelghani, et al.
Publicado: (2024)

Position: The Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Community Should Adopt a More Transparent and Regulated Peer Review Process
por: Yang, Jing
Publicado: (2025)

Deferred Acceptance Algorithm Improves Peer Review Process
por: Bartneck, Christoph, et al.
Publicado: (2026)

Beyond the Lens: Quantifying the Impact of Scientific Documentaries through Amazon Reviews
por: Naiman, Jill, et al.
Publicado: (2025)

IsamasRed: A Public Dataset Tracking Reddit Discussions on Israel-Hamas Conflict
por: Chen, Kai, et al.
Publicado: (2024)

The geography of novel and atypical research
por: Ke, Qing, et al.
Publicado: (2025)

R-Index: A Metric for Assessing Researcher Contributions to Peer Review
por: Malekzadeh, Milad
Publicado: (2024)

Unleashing the Power of AI. A Systematic Review of Cutting-Edge Techniques in AI-Enhanced Scientometrics, Webometrics, and Bibliometrics
por: Saeidnia, Hamid Reza, et al.
Publicado: (2024)

The More You Automate, the Less You See: Hidden Pitfalls of AI Scientist Systems
por: Luo, Ziming, et al.
Publicado: (2025)

SyROCCo: Enhancing Systematic Reviews using Machine Learning
por: Fang, Zheng, et al.
Publicado: (2024)

ARA: Agentic Reproducibility Assessment For Scalable Support Of Scientific Peer-Review
por: Riehl, Kevin, et al.
Publicado: (2026)

Can Large Language Models Evaluate Grant Proposal Quality? Revisiting the Wennerås and Wold Peer Review Data
por: Sandström, Ulf, et al.
Publicado: (2026)

Policies Permitting LLM Use for Polishing Peer Reviews Are Currently Not Enforceable
por: Saha, Rounak, et al.
Publicado: (2026)

Survivors, Complainers, and Borderliners: Upward Bias in Online Discussions of Academic Conference Reviews
por: Zhu, Hangxiao, et al.
Publicado: (2025)

The European Digital Economy
Publicado: (2023)

Machine Learning Information Retrieval and Summarisation to Support Systematic Review on Outcomes Based Contracting
por: Bilal, Iman Munire, et al.
Publicado: (2024)

Automated Peer Reviewing in Paper SEA: Standardization, Evaluation, and Analysis
por: Yu, Jianxiang, et al.
Publicado: (2024)

AI-Assisted Writing Is Growing Fastest Among Non-English-Speaking and Less Established Scientists
por: Liu, Jialin, et al.
Publicado: (2025)

Two scholarly publishing cultures? Open access drives a divergence in European academic publishing practices
por: Kopitar, Leon, et al.
Publicado: (2024)