Demystifying and avoiding the OLS "weighting problem": Unmodeled heterogeneity and straightforward solutions

Fuente: arXiv
Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Shinkre, Tanvi, Hazlett, Chad
Format: Preprint
Veröffentlicht: 2024
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
_version_ 1866910925285490688
author Shinkre, Tanvi
Hazlett, Chad
author_facet Shinkre, Tanvi
Hazlett, Chad
contents Researchers frequently estimate treatment effects by regressing outcomes (Y) on treatment (D) and covariates (X). Even without unobserved confounding, the coefficient on D yields a conditional-variance-weighted average of strata-wise effects, not the average treatment effect. Scholars have proposed characterizing the severity of these weights, evaluating resulting biases, or changing investigators' target estimand to the conditional-variance-weighted effect. We aim to demystify these weights, clarifying how they arise, what they represent, and how to avoid them. Specifically, these weights reflect misspecification bias from unmodeled treatment-effect heterogeneity. Rather than diagnosing or tolerating them, we recommend avoiding the issue altogether, by relaxing the standard regression assumption of "single linearity" to one of "separate linearity" (of each potential outcome in the covariates), accommodating heterogeneity. Numerous methods--including regression imputation (g-computation), interacted regression, and mean balancing weights--satisfy this assumption. In many settings, the efficiency cost to avoiding this weighting problem altogether will be modest and worthwhile.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2403_03299
institution arXiv
publishDate 2024
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Demystifying and avoiding the OLS "weighting problem": Unmodeled heterogeneity and straightforward solutions
Shinkre, Tanvi
Hazlett, Chad
Methodology
Econometrics
Applications
Researchers frequently estimate treatment effects by regressing outcomes (Y) on treatment (D) and covariates (X). Even without unobserved confounding, the coefficient on D yields a conditional-variance-weighted average of strata-wise effects, not the average treatment effect. Scholars have proposed characterizing the severity of these weights, evaluating resulting biases, or changing investigators' target estimand to the conditional-variance-weighted effect. We aim to demystify these weights, clarifying how they arise, what they represent, and how to avoid them. Specifically, these weights reflect misspecification bias from unmodeled treatment-effect heterogeneity. Rather than diagnosing or tolerating them, we recommend avoiding the issue altogether, by relaxing the standard regression assumption of "single linearity" to one of "separate linearity" (of each potential outcome in the covariates), accommodating heterogeneity. Numerous methods--including regression imputation (g-computation), interacted regression, and mean balancing weights--satisfy this assumption. In many settings, the efficiency cost to avoiding this weighting problem altogether will be modest and worthwhile.
title Demystifying and avoiding the OLS "weighting problem": Unmodeled heterogeneity and straightforward solutions
topic Methodology
Econometrics
Applications
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.03299