Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2024
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.05549 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866911791780462592 |
|---|---|
| author | Ruiz-Torrubiano, Rubén Knopp, Sebastian Wolf, Lukas Matthias Krystallidis, Andreas |
| author_facet | Ruiz-Torrubiano, Rubén Knopp, Sebastian Wolf, Lukas Matthias Krystallidis, Andreas |
| contents | In modular educational systems, students are allowed to choose a part of their own curriculum themselves. This is typically done in the final class levels which lead to maturity for university access. The rationale behind letting students choose their courses themselves is to enhance self-responsibility, improve student motivation, and allow a focus on specific areas of interest. A central instrument for bringing these systems to fruition is the timetable. However, scheduling the timetable in such systems can be an extremely challenging and time-consuming task. In this study, we present a framework for classifying modular educational systems in Europe that reflects different degrees of freedom regarding student choices, and explore the consequences from the perspective of scheduling a timetable that satisfies all requirements from the organizational and the pedagogical perspective. For this purpose, we conducted interviews in Austria, Germany, Finland, Switzerland, the Netherlands, and Luxembourg and apply the framework to these educational systems, finding that among them the Finnish system shows the highest degree of modularity. After analyzing the consequences of modularity from the scheduling perspective, we assess the necessity for automated scheduling methods, which are central for realizing the potential and many benefits of modular education in practice. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2403_05549 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2024 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | A Scheduling Perspective on Modular Educational Systems in Europe Ruiz-Torrubiano, Rubén Knopp, Sebastian Wolf, Lukas Matthias Krystallidis, Andreas Computers and Society J.1; I.2.8 In modular educational systems, students are allowed to choose a part of their own curriculum themselves. This is typically done in the final class levels which lead to maturity for university access. The rationale behind letting students choose their courses themselves is to enhance self-responsibility, improve student motivation, and allow a focus on specific areas of interest. A central instrument for bringing these systems to fruition is the timetable. However, scheduling the timetable in such systems can be an extremely challenging and time-consuming task. In this study, we present a framework for classifying modular educational systems in Europe that reflects different degrees of freedom regarding student choices, and explore the consequences from the perspective of scheduling a timetable that satisfies all requirements from the organizational and the pedagogical perspective. For this purpose, we conducted interviews in Austria, Germany, Finland, Switzerland, the Netherlands, and Luxembourg and apply the framework to these educational systems, finding that among them the Finnish system shows the highest degree of modularity. After analyzing the consequences of modularity from the scheduling perspective, we assess the necessity for automated scheduling methods, which are central for realizing the potential and many benefits of modular education in practice. |
| title | A Scheduling Perspective on Modular Educational Systems in Europe |
| topic | Computers and Society J.1; I.2.8 |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.05549 |