Enregistré dans:
Détails bibliographiques
Auteurs principaux: Schwartz, Tal, Hutchison, James A.
Format: Preprint
Publié: 2024
Sujets:
Accès en ligne:https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.06001
Tags: Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!
_version_ 1866916155360280576
author Schwartz, Tal
Hutchison, James A.
author_facet Schwartz, Tal
Hutchison, James A.
contents Recently, an article by the Barnes group reported on the experimental study of a photoisomerization reaction inside an optical cavity, claiming to reproduce previous results by Hutchison et al. and making the point that in such setups, changes in the absorption of ultraviolet radiation by the molecules in the cavity can lead to modifications in the photochemical reaction rate. While Hutchison et al. associated such modifications with the emergence of strong light-matter coupling, in their attempt to re-examine these experiments, Barnes et al. did not find any evidence that strong coupling needs to be invoked to explain the observed effects. In response to this publication, we herein highlight the main differences between the two experimental studies, and explain why the results of Barnes et al. are irrelevant to the former study and have no bearing on its conclusions. Specifically, we show that under the experimental conditions used by Hutchison et al. such intensity-modification effects are negligible and can therefore be ruled out.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2403_06001
institution arXiv
publishDate 2024
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle On the importance of experimental details: A Comment on "Non-Polaritonic Effects in Cavity-Modified Photochemistry"
Schwartz, Tal
Hutchison, James A.
Chemical Physics
Materials Science
Quantum Physics
Recently, an article by the Barnes group reported on the experimental study of a photoisomerization reaction inside an optical cavity, claiming to reproduce previous results by Hutchison et al. and making the point that in such setups, changes in the absorption of ultraviolet radiation by the molecules in the cavity can lead to modifications in the photochemical reaction rate. While Hutchison et al. associated such modifications with the emergence of strong light-matter coupling, in their attempt to re-examine these experiments, Barnes et al. did not find any evidence that strong coupling needs to be invoked to explain the observed effects. In response to this publication, we herein highlight the main differences between the two experimental studies, and explain why the results of Barnes et al. are irrelevant to the former study and have no bearing on its conclusions. Specifically, we show that under the experimental conditions used by Hutchison et al. such intensity-modification effects are negligible and can therefore be ruled out.
title On the importance of experimental details: A Comment on "Non-Polaritonic Effects in Cavity-Modified Photochemistry"
topic Chemical Physics
Materials Science
Quantum Physics
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.06001