SIFiD: Reassess Summary Factual Inconsistency Detection with LLM

Fuente: arXiv
Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Yang, Jiuding, Liu, Hui, Guo, Weidong, Rao, Zhuwei, Xu, Yu, Niu, Di
Format: Preprint
Veröffentlicht: 2024
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
_version_ 1866911793659510784
author Yang, Jiuding
Liu, Hui
Guo, Weidong
Rao, Zhuwei
Xu, Yu
Niu, Di
author_facet Yang, Jiuding
Liu, Hui
Guo, Weidong
Rao, Zhuwei
Xu, Yu
Niu, Di
contents Ensuring factual consistency between the summary and the original document is paramount in summarization tasks. Consequently, considerable effort has been dedicated to detecting inconsistencies. With the advent of Large Language Models (LLMs), recent studies have begun to leverage their advanced language understanding capabilities for inconsistency detection. However, early attempts have shown that LLMs underperform traditional models due to their limited ability to follow instructions and the absence of an effective detection methodology. In this study, we reassess summary inconsistency detection with LLMs, comparing the performances of GPT-3.5 and GPT-4. To advance research in LLM-based inconsistency detection, we propose SIFiD (Summary Inconsistency Detection with Filtered Document) that identify key sentences within documents by either employing natural language inference or measuring semantic similarity between summaries and documents.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2403_07557
institution arXiv
publishDate 2024
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle SIFiD: Reassess Summary Factual Inconsistency Detection with LLM
Yang, Jiuding
Liu, Hui
Guo, Weidong
Rao, Zhuwei
Xu, Yu
Niu, Di
Computation and Language
Machine Learning
Ensuring factual consistency between the summary and the original document is paramount in summarization tasks. Consequently, considerable effort has been dedicated to detecting inconsistencies. With the advent of Large Language Models (LLMs), recent studies have begun to leverage their advanced language understanding capabilities for inconsistency detection. However, early attempts have shown that LLMs underperform traditional models due to their limited ability to follow instructions and the absence of an effective detection methodology. In this study, we reassess summary inconsistency detection with LLMs, comparing the performances of GPT-3.5 and GPT-4. To advance research in LLM-based inconsistency detection, we propose SIFiD (Summary Inconsistency Detection with Filtered Document) that identify key sentences within documents by either employing natural language inference or measuring semantic similarity between summaries and documents.
title SIFiD: Reassess Summary Factual Inconsistency Detection with LLM
topic Computation and Language
Machine Learning
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.07557