Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Dunn, Jonathan
Format: Preprint
Published: 2024
Subjects:
Online Access:https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.08198
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866911794719621120
author Dunn, Jonathan
author_facet Dunn, Jonathan
contents This paper investigates the impact of corpus creation decisions on large multi-lingual geographic web corpora. Beginning with a 427 billion word corpus derived from the Common Crawl, three methods are used to improve the quality of sub-corpora representing specific language-country pairs like New Zealand English: (i) the agreement of independent language identification systems, (ii) hash-based deduplication, and (iii) location-specific outlier detection. The impact of each of these steps is then evaluated at the language level and the country level by using corpus similarity measures to compare each resulting corpus with baseline data sets. The goal is to understand the impact of upstream data cleaning decisions on downstream corpora with a specific focus on under-represented languages and populations. The evaluation shows that the validity of sub-corpora is improved with each stage of cleaning but that this improvement is unevenly distributed across languages and populations. This result shows how standard corpus creation techniques can accidentally exclude under-represented populations.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2403_08198
institution arXiv
publishDate 2024
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Validating and Exploring Large Geographic Corpora
Dunn, Jonathan
Computation and Language
This paper investigates the impact of corpus creation decisions on large multi-lingual geographic web corpora. Beginning with a 427 billion word corpus derived from the Common Crawl, three methods are used to improve the quality of sub-corpora representing specific language-country pairs like New Zealand English: (i) the agreement of independent language identification systems, (ii) hash-based deduplication, and (iii) location-specific outlier detection. The impact of each of these steps is then evaluated at the language level and the country level by using corpus similarity measures to compare each resulting corpus with baseline data sets. The goal is to understand the impact of upstream data cleaning decisions on downstream corpora with a specific focus on under-represented languages and populations. The evaluation shows that the validity of sub-corpora is improved with each stage of cleaning but that this improvement is unevenly distributed across languages and populations. This result shows how standard corpus creation techniques can accidentally exclude under-represented populations.
title Validating and Exploring Large Geographic Corpora
topic Computation and Language
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.08198