Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2024
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.11011 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866909139199852544 |
|---|---|
| author | Hogg, David W. Casey, Andrew R. |
| author_facet | Hogg, David W. Casey, Andrew R. |
| contents | When there are many observations of an astronomical source - many images with different dithers, or many spectra taken at different barycentric velocities - it is standard practice to shift and stack the data, to (for example) make a high signal-to-noise average image or mean spectrum. Bound-saturating measurements are made by manipulating a likelihood function, where the data are treated as fixed, and model parameters are modified to fit the data. Traditional shifting and stacking of data can be converted into a model-fitting procedure, such that the data are not modified, and yet the output is the shift-adjusted mean. The key component of this conversion is a spectral model that is completely flexible but also a continuous function of wavelength (or position in the case of imaging) that can represent any signal being measured by the device after any reasonable translation (or rotation or field distortion). The benefits of a modeling approach are myriad: The sacred data never are modified. Noise maps, data gaps, and bad-data masks don't require interpolation. The output can take the form of an image or spectrum evaluated on a pixel grid, as is traditional. In addition to shifts, the model can account for line-spread or point-spread function variations, world-coordinate-system variations, and calibration or normalization variations. The noise in the output becomes uncorrelated across neighboring pixels as the shifts deliver good coverage in some sense. The only cost is a small increase in computational complexity over that of traditional methods. We demonstrate the method with a small data example and we provide open source sample code for re-use. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2403_11011 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2024 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Frizzle: Combining spectra or images by forward modeling Hogg, David W. Casey, Andrew R. Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics When there are many observations of an astronomical source - many images with different dithers, or many spectra taken at different barycentric velocities - it is standard practice to shift and stack the data, to (for example) make a high signal-to-noise average image or mean spectrum. Bound-saturating measurements are made by manipulating a likelihood function, where the data are treated as fixed, and model parameters are modified to fit the data. Traditional shifting and stacking of data can be converted into a model-fitting procedure, such that the data are not modified, and yet the output is the shift-adjusted mean. The key component of this conversion is a spectral model that is completely flexible but also a continuous function of wavelength (or position in the case of imaging) that can represent any signal being measured by the device after any reasonable translation (or rotation or field distortion). The benefits of a modeling approach are myriad: The sacred data never are modified. Noise maps, data gaps, and bad-data masks don't require interpolation. The output can take the form of an image or spectrum evaluated on a pixel grid, as is traditional. In addition to shifts, the model can account for line-spread or point-spread function variations, world-coordinate-system variations, and calibration or normalization variations. The noise in the output becomes uncorrelated across neighboring pixels as the shifts deliver good coverage in some sense. The only cost is a small increase in computational complexity over that of traditional methods. We demonstrate the method with a small data example and we provide open source sample code for re-use. |
| title | Frizzle: Combining spectra or images by forward modeling |
| topic | Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.11011 |