OpenEval: Benchmarking Chinese LLMs across Capability, Alignment and Safety
Fuente:
arXiv
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2024
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866910373199740928 |
|---|---|
| author | Liu, Chuang Yu, Linhao Li, Jiaxuan Jin, Renren Huang, Yufei Shi, Ling Zhang, Junhui Ji, Xinmeng Cui, Tingting Liu, Tao Song, Jinwang Zan, Hongying Li, Sun Xiong, Deyi |
| author_facet | Liu, Chuang Yu, Linhao Li, Jiaxuan Jin, Renren Huang, Yufei Shi, Ling Zhang, Junhui Ji, Xinmeng Cui, Tingting Liu, Tao Song, Jinwang Zan, Hongying Li, Sun Xiong, Deyi |
| contents | The rapid development of Chinese large language models (LLMs) poses big challenges for efficient LLM evaluation. While current initiatives have introduced new benchmarks or evaluation platforms for assessing Chinese LLMs, many of these focus primarily on capabilities, usually overlooking potential alignment and safety issues. To address this gap, we introduce OpenEval, an evaluation testbed that benchmarks Chinese LLMs across capability, alignment and safety. For capability assessment, we include 12 benchmark datasets to evaluate Chinese LLMs from 4 sub-dimensions: NLP tasks, disciplinary knowledge, commonsense reasoning and mathematical reasoning. For alignment assessment, OpenEval contains 7 datasets that examines the bias, offensiveness and illegalness in the outputs yielded by Chinese LLMs. To evaluate safety, especially anticipated risks (e.g., power-seeking, self-awareness) of advanced LLMs, we include 6 datasets. In addition to these benchmarks, we have implemented a phased public evaluation and benchmark update strategy to ensure that OpenEval is in line with the development of Chinese LLMs or even able to provide cutting-edge benchmark datasets to guide the development of Chinese LLMs. In our first public evaluation, we have tested a range of Chinese LLMs, spanning from 7B to 72B parameters, including both open-source and proprietary models. Evaluation results indicate that while Chinese LLMs have shown impressive performance in certain tasks, more attention should be directed towards broader aspects such as commonsense reasoning, alignment, and safety. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2403_12316 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2024 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | OpenEval: Benchmarking Chinese LLMs across Capability, Alignment and Safety Liu, Chuang Yu, Linhao Li, Jiaxuan Jin, Renren Huang, Yufei Shi, Ling Zhang, Junhui Ji, Xinmeng Cui, Tingting Liu, Tao Song, Jinwang Zan, Hongying Li, Sun Xiong, Deyi Computation and Language The rapid development of Chinese large language models (LLMs) poses big challenges for efficient LLM evaluation. While current initiatives have introduced new benchmarks or evaluation platforms for assessing Chinese LLMs, many of these focus primarily on capabilities, usually overlooking potential alignment and safety issues. To address this gap, we introduce OpenEval, an evaluation testbed that benchmarks Chinese LLMs across capability, alignment and safety. For capability assessment, we include 12 benchmark datasets to evaluate Chinese LLMs from 4 sub-dimensions: NLP tasks, disciplinary knowledge, commonsense reasoning and mathematical reasoning. For alignment assessment, OpenEval contains 7 datasets that examines the bias, offensiveness and illegalness in the outputs yielded by Chinese LLMs. To evaluate safety, especially anticipated risks (e.g., power-seeking, self-awareness) of advanced LLMs, we include 6 datasets. In addition to these benchmarks, we have implemented a phased public evaluation and benchmark update strategy to ensure that OpenEval is in line with the development of Chinese LLMs or even able to provide cutting-edge benchmark datasets to guide the development of Chinese LLMs. In our first public evaluation, we have tested a range of Chinese LLMs, spanning from 7B to 72B parameters, including both open-source and proprietary models. Evaluation results indicate that while Chinese LLMs have shown impressive performance in certain tasks, more attention should be directed towards broader aspects such as commonsense reasoning, alignment, and safety. |
| title | OpenEval: Benchmarking Chinese LLMs across Capability, Alignment and Safety |
| topic | Computation and Language |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.12316 |