Fact Checking Chatbot: A Misinformation Intervention for Instant Messaging Apps and an Analysis of Trust in the Fact Checkers
Fuente:
arXiv
Gespeichert in:
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Veröffentlicht: |
2024
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| _version_ | 1866914720263438336 |
|---|---|
| author | Lim, Gionnieve Perrault, Simon T. |
| author_facet | Lim, Gionnieve Perrault, Simon T. |
| contents | In Singapore, there has been a rise in misinformation on mobile instant messaging services (MIMS). MIMS support both small peer-to-peer networks and large groups. Misinformation in the former may spread due to recipients' trust in the sender while in the latter, misinformation can directly reach a wide audience. The encryption of MIMS makes it difficult to address misinformation directly. As such, chatbots have become an alternative solution where users can disclose their chat content directly to fact checking services. To understand how effective fact checking chatbots are as an intervention and how trust in three different fact checkers (i.e., Government, News Outlets, and Artificial Intelligence) may affect this trust, we conducted a within-subjects experiment with 527 Singapore residents. We found mixed results for the fact checkers but support for the chatbot intervention overall. We also found a striking contradiction between participants' trust in the fact checkers and their behaviour towards them. Specifically, those who reported a high level of trust in the government performed worse and tended to follow the fact checking tool less when it was endorsed by the government. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2403_12913 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2024 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Fact Checking Chatbot: A Misinformation Intervention for Instant Messaging Apps and an Analysis of Trust in the Fact Checkers Lim, Gionnieve Perrault, Simon T. Human-Computer Interaction In Singapore, there has been a rise in misinformation on mobile instant messaging services (MIMS). MIMS support both small peer-to-peer networks and large groups. Misinformation in the former may spread due to recipients' trust in the sender while in the latter, misinformation can directly reach a wide audience. The encryption of MIMS makes it difficult to address misinformation directly. As such, chatbots have become an alternative solution where users can disclose their chat content directly to fact checking services. To understand how effective fact checking chatbots are as an intervention and how trust in three different fact checkers (i.e., Government, News Outlets, and Artificial Intelligence) may affect this trust, we conducted a within-subjects experiment with 527 Singapore residents. We found mixed results for the fact checkers but support for the chatbot intervention overall. We also found a striking contradiction between participants' trust in the fact checkers and their behaviour towards them. Specifically, those who reported a high level of trust in the government performed worse and tended to follow the fact checking tool less when it was endorsed by the government. |
| title | Fact Checking Chatbot: A Misinformation Intervention for Instant Messaging Apps and an Analysis of Trust in the Fact Checkers |
| topic | Human-Computer Interaction |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.12913 |