MathVerse: Does Your Multi-modal LLM Truly See the Diagrams in Visual Math Problems?

Fuente: arXiv
Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Zhang, Renrui, Jiang, Dongzhi, Zhang, Yichi, Lin, Haokun, Guo, Ziyu, Qiu, Pengshuo, Zhou, Aojun, Lu, Pan, Chang, Kai-Wei, Gao, Peng, Li, Hongsheng
Format: Preprint
Veröffentlicht: 2024
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
_version_ 1866916360154513408
author Zhang, Renrui
Jiang, Dongzhi
Zhang, Yichi
Lin, Haokun
Guo, Ziyu
Qiu, Pengshuo
Zhou, Aojun
Lu, Pan
Chang, Kai-Wei
Gao, Peng
Li, Hongsheng
author_facet Zhang, Renrui
Jiang, Dongzhi
Zhang, Yichi
Lin, Haokun
Guo, Ziyu
Qiu, Pengshuo
Zhou, Aojun
Lu, Pan
Chang, Kai-Wei
Gao, Peng
Li, Hongsheng
contents The remarkable progress of Multi-modal Large Language Models (MLLMs) has garnered unparalleled attention, due to their superior performance in visual contexts. However, their capabilities in visual math problem-solving remain insufficiently evaluated and understood. We investigate current benchmarks to incorporate excessive visual content within textual questions, which potentially assist MLLMs in deducing answers without truly interpreting the input diagrams. To this end, we introduce MathVerse, an all-around visual math benchmark designed for an equitable and in-depth evaluation of MLLMs. We meticulously collect 2,612 high-quality, multi-subject math problems with diagrams from publicly available sources. Each problem is then transformed by human annotators into six distinct versions, each offering varying degrees of information content in multi-modality, contributing to 15K test samples in total. This approach allows MathVerse to comprehensively assess whether and how much MLLMs can truly understand the visual diagrams for mathematical reasoning. In addition, we propose a Chain-of-Thought (CoT) evaluation strategy for a fine-grained assessment of the output answers. Rather than naively judging True or False, we employ GPT-4(V) to adaptively extract crucial reasoning steps, and then score each step with detailed error analysis, which can reveal the intermediate CoT reasoning quality by MLLMs. We hope the MathVerse benchmark may provide unique insights to guide the future development of MLLMs. Project page: https://mathverse-cuhk.github.io
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2403_14624
institution arXiv
publishDate 2024
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle MathVerse: Does Your Multi-modal LLM Truly See the Diagrams in Visual Math Problems?
Zhang, Renrui
Jiang, Dongzhi
Zhang, Yichi
Lin, Haokun
Guo, Ziyu
Qiu, Pengshuo
Zhou, Aojun
Lu, Pan
Chang, Kai-Wei
Gao, Peng
Li, Hongsheng
Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
Artificial Intelligence
Computation and Language
Machine Learning
The remarkable progress of Multi-modal Large Language Models (MLLMs) has garnered unparalleled attention, due to their superior performance in visual contexts. However, their capabilities in visual math problem-solving remain insufficiently evaluated and understood. We investigate current benchmarks to incorporate excessive visual content within textual questions, which potentially assist MLLMs in deducing answers without truly interpreting the input diagrams. To this end, we introduce MathVerse, an all-around visual math benchmark designed for an equitable and in-depth evaluation of MLLMs. We meticulously collect 2,612 high-quality, multi-subject math problems with diagrams from publicly available sources. Each problem is then transformed by human annotators into six distinct versions, each offering varying degrees of information content in multi-modality, contributing to 15K test samples in total. This approach allows MathVerse to comprehensively assess whether and how much MLLMs can truly understand the visual diagrams for mathematical reasoning. In addition, we propose a Chain-of-Thought (CoT) evaluation strategy for a fine-grained assessment of the output answers. Rather than naively judging True or False, we employ GPT-4(V) to adaptively extract crucial reasoning steps, and then score each step with detailed error analysis, which can reveal the intermediate CoT reasoning quality by MLLMs. We hope the MathVerse benchmark may provide unique insights to guide the future development of MLLMs. Project page: https://mathverse-cuhk.github.io
title MathVerse: Does Your Multi-modal LLM Truly See the Diagrams in Visual Math Problems?
topic Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
Artificial Intelligence
Computation and Language
Machine Learning
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.14624