On two-sample testing for data with arbitrarily missing values

Fuente: arXiv
Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zeng, Yijin, Adams, Niall M., Bodenham, Dean A.
Formato: Preprint
Publicado: 2024
Materias:
Acceso en línea:
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
_version_ 1866913278465146880
author Zeng, Yijin
Adams, Niall M.
Bodenham, Dean A.
author_facet Zeng, Yijin
Adams, Niall M.
Bodenham, Dean A.
contents We develop a new rank-based approach for univariate two-sample testing in the presence of missing data which makes no assumptions about the missingness mechanism. This approach is a theoretical extension of the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test that controls the Type I error by providing exact bounds for the test statistic after accounting for the number of missing values. Greater statistical power is shown when the method is extended to account for a bounded domain. Furthermore, exact bounds are provided on the proportions of data that can be missing in the two samples while yielding a significant result. Simulations demonstrate that our method has good power, typically for cases of $10\%$ to $20\%$ missing data, while standard imputation approaches fail to control the Type I error. We illustrate our method on complex clinical trial data in which patients' withdrawal from the trial lead to missing values.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2403_15327
institution arXiv
publishDate 2024
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle On two-sample testing for data with arbitrarily missing values
Zeng, Yijin
Adams, Niall M.
Bodenham, Dean A.
Methodology
62
We develop a new rank-based approach for univariate two-sample testing in the presence of missing data which makes no assumptions about the missingness mechanism. This approach is a theoretical extension of the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test that controls the Type I error by providing exact bounds for the test statistic after accounting for the number of missing values. Greater statistical power is shown when the method is extended to account for a bounded domain. Furthermore, exact bounds are provided on the proportions of data that can be missing in the two samples while yielding a significant result. Simulations demonstrate that our method has good power, typically for cases of $10\%$ to $20\%$ missing data, while standard imputation approaches fail to control the Type I error. We illustrate our method on complex clinical trial data in which patients' withdrawal from the trial lead to missing values.
title On two-sample testing for data with arbitrarily missing values
topic Methodology
62
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.15327