Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Ming, Sun, Zhiyong
Formato: Preprint
Publicado: 2024
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.15743
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
_version_ 1866916692126334976
author Li, Ming
Sun, Zhiyong
author_facet Li, Ming
Sun, Zhiyong
contents In this paper, we demonstrate that controllers designed by artificial potential fields (APFs) can be derived from reciprocal control barrier function quadratic program (RCBF-QP) safety filters. By integrating APFs within the RCBF-QP framework, we explicitly establish the relationship between these two approaches. Specifically, we first introduce the concepts of tightened control Lyapunov functions (T-CLFs) and tightened reciprocal control barrier functions (T-RCBFs), each of which incorporates a flexible auxiliary function. We then utilize an attractive potential field as a T-CLF to guide the nominal controller design, and a repulsive potential field as a T-RCBF to formulate an RCBF-QP safety filter. With appropriately chosen auxiliary functions, we show that controllers designed by APFs and those derived by RCBF-QP safety filters are equivalent. Based on this insight, we further generalize the APF-based controllers (equivalently, RCBF-QP safety filter-based controllers) to more general scenarios without restricting the choice of auxiliary functions. Finally, we present a collision avoidance example to clearly illustrate the connection and equivalence between the two methods.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2403_15743
institution arXiv
publishDate 2024
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle A Comparative Study of Artificial Potential Fields and Reciprocal Control Barrier Function-based Safety Filters
Li, Ming
Sun, Zhiyong
Systems and Control
Artificial Intelligence
Dynamical Systems
In this paper, we demonstrate that controllers designed by artificial potential fields (APFs) can be derived from reciprocal control barrier function quadratic program (RCBF-QP) safety filters. By integrating APFs within the RCBF-QP framework, we explicitly establish the relationship between these two approaches. Specifically, we first introduce the concepts of tightened control Lyapunov functions (T-CLFs) and tightened reciprocal control barrier functions (T-RCBFs), each of which incorporates a flexible auxiliary function. We then utilize an attractive potential field as a T-CLF to guide the nominal controller design, and a repulsive potential field as a T-RCBF to formulate an RCBF-QP safety filter. With appropriately chosen auxiliary functions, we show that controllers designed by APFs and those derived by RCBF-QP safety filters are equivalent. Based on this insight, we further generalize the APF-based controllers (equivalently, RCBF-QP safety filter-based controllers) to more general scenarios without restricting the choice of auxiliary functions. Finally, we present a collision avoidance example to clearly illustrate the connection and equivalence between the two methods.
title A Comparative Study of Artificial Potential Fields and Reciprocal Control Barrier Function-based Safety Filters
topic Systems and Control
Artificial Intelligence
Dynamical Systems
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.15743