Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Huang, Jingyue, Wu, Changbao, Zeng, Leilei
Format: Preprint
Published: 2024
Subjects:
Online Access:https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.16283
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866909149234724864
author Huang, Jingyue
Wu, Changbao
Zeng, Leilei
author_facet Huang, Jingyue
Wu, Changbao
Zeng, Leilei
contents Causal inference is crucial for understanding the true impact of interventions, policies, or actions, enabling informed decision-making and providing insights into the underlying mechanisms that shape our world. In this paper, we establish a framework for the estimation and inference of average treatment effects using a two-sample empirical likelihood function. Two different approaches to incorporating propensity scores are developed. The first approach introduces propensity scores calibrated constraints in addition to the standard model-calibration constraints; the second approach uses the propensity scores to form weighted versions of the model-calibration constraints. The resulting estimators from both approaches are doubly robust. The limiting distributions of the two sample empirical likelihood ratio statistics are derived, facilitating the construction of confidence intervals and hypothesis tests for the average treatment effect. Bootstrap methods for constructing sample empirical likelihood ratio confidence intervals are also discussed for both approaches. Finite sample performances of the methods are investigated through simulation studies.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2403_16283
institution arXiv
publishDate 2024
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Sample Empirical Likelihood Methods for Causal Inference
Huang, Jingyue
Wu, Changbao
Zeng, Leilei
Methodology
Causal inference is crucial for understanding the true impact of interventions, policies, or actions, enabling informed decision-making and providing insights into the underlying mechanisms that shape our world. In this paper, we establish a framework for the estimation and inference of average treatment effects using a two-sample empirical likelihood function. Two different approaches to incorporating propensity scores are developed. The first approach introduces propensity scores calibrated constraints in addition to the standard model-calibration constraints; the second approach uses the propensity scores to form weighted versions of the model-calibration constraints. The resulting estimators from both approaches are doubly robust. The limiting distributions of the two sample empirical likelihood ratio statistics are derived, facilitating the construction of confidence intervals and hypothesis tests for the average treatment effect. Bootstrap methods for constructing sample empirical likelihood ratio confidence intervals are also discussed for both approaches. Finite sample performances of the methods are investigated through simulation studies.
title Sample Empirical Likelihood Methods for Causal Inference
topic Methodology
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.16283