Hallucination Detection in Foundation Models for Decision-Making: A Flexible Definition and Review of the State of the Art

Fuente: arXiv
Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chakraborty, Neeloy, Ornik, Melkior, Driggs-Campbell, Katherine
Format: Preprint
Published: 2024
Subjects:
Online Access:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866917918117199872
author Chakraborty, Neeloy
Ornik, Melkior
Driggs-Campbell, Katherine
author_facet Chakraborty, Neeloy
Ornik, Melkior
Driggs-Campbell, Katherine
contents Autonomous systems are soon to be ubiquitous, spanning manufacturing, agriculture, healthcare, entertainment, and other industries. Most of these systems are developed with modular sub-components for decision-making, planning, and control that may be hand-engineered or learning-based. While these approaches perform well under the situations they were specifically designed for, they can perform especially poorly in out-of-distribution scenarios that will undoubtedly arise at test-time. The rise of foundation models trained on multiple tasks with impressively large datasets has led researchers to believe that these models may provide "common sense" reasoning that existing planners are missing, bridging the gap between algorithm development and deployment. While researchers have shown promising results in deploying foundation models to decision-making tasks, these models are known to hallucinate and generate decisions that may sound reasonable, but are in fact poor. We argue there is a need to step back and simultaneously design systems that can quantify the certainty of a model's decision, and detect when it may be hallucinating. In this work, we discuss the current use cases of foundation models for decision-making tasks, provide a general definition for hallucinations with examples, discuss existing approaches to hallucination detection and mitigation with a focus on decision problems, present guidelines, and explore areas for further research in this exciting field.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2403_16527
institution arXiv
publishDate 2024
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Hallucination Detection in Foundation Models for Decision-Making: A Flexible Definition and Review of the State of the Art
Chakraborty, Neeloy
Ornik, Melkior
Driggs-Campbell, Katherine
Artificial Intelligence
Computation and Language
Robotics
Autonomous systems are soon to be ubiquitous, spanning manufacturing, agriculture, healthcare, entertainment, and other industries. Most of these systems are developed with modular sub-components for decision-making, planning, and control that may be hand-engineered or learning-based. While these approaches perform well under the situations they were specifically designed for, they can perform especially poorly in out-of-distribution scenarios that will undoubtedly arise at test-time. The rise of foundation models trained on multiple tasks with impressively large datasets has led researchers to believe that these models may provide "common sense" reasoning that existing planners are missing, bridging the gap between algorithm development and deployment. While researchers have shown promising results in deploying foundation models to decision-making tasks, these models are known to hallucinate and generate decisions that may sound reasonable, but are in fact poor. We argue there is a need to step back and simultaneously design systems that can quantify the certainty of a model's decision, and detect when it may be hallucinating. In this work, we discuss the current use cases of foundation models for decision-making tasks, provide a general definition for hallucinations with examples, discuss existing approaches to hallucination detection and mitigation with a focus on decision problems, present guidelines, and explore areas for further research in this exciting field.
title Hallucination Detection in Foundation Models for Decision-Making: A Flexible Definition and Review of the State of the Art
topic Artificial Intelligence
Computation and Language
Robotics
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.16527