Can social media provide early warning of retraction? Evidence from critical tweets identified by human annotation and large language models

Fuente: arXiv

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors:	Zheng, Er-Te, Fu, Hui-Zhen, Thelwall, Mike, Fang, Zhichao
Format:	Preprint
Published:	2024
Subjects:	Digital Libraries Artificial Intelligence Computation and Language Machine Learning
Online Access:	Acceder al recurso
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

Similar Items

Can social media provide early warning of retraction? Evidence from critical tweets identified by human annotation and large language models
by: Er‐Te Zheng, et al.
Published: (2025)

Do male leading authors retract more articles than female leading authors?
by: Zheng, Er-Te, et al.
Published: (2025)

Can news and social media attention reduce the influence of problematic research?
by: Zheng, Er-Te, et al.
Published: (2025)

Science discussions of retracted articles on Bluesky: public scrutiny or misinformation spreading?
by: Zheng, Er-Te, et al.
Published: (2026)

How is science discussed on Bluesky?
by: Zheng, Er-Te, et al.
Published: (2025)

Designing large language model prompts to extract scores from messy text: A shared dataset and challenge
by: Thelwall, Mike
Published: (2026)

Can ChatGPT evaluate research quality?
by: Thelwall, Mike
Published: (2024)

Can Smaller Large Language Models Evaluate Research Quality?
by: Thelwall, Mike
Published: (2025)

Social media uptake of scientific journals: A comparison between X and WeChat
by: Cong, Ting, et al.
Published: (2025)

Can ChatGPT evaluate research environments? Evidence from REF2021
by: Kousha, Kayvan, et al.
Published: (2025)

How much are LLMs changing the language of academic papers after ChatGPT? A multi-database and full text analysis
by: Kousha, Kayvan, et al.
Published: (2025)

Can Large Language Models Evaluate Grant Proposal Quality? Revisiting the Wennerås and Wold Peer Review Data
by: Sandström, Ulf, et al.
Published: (2026)

In which fields do ChatGPT scores align better than citations with research quality?
by: Thelwall, Mike
Published: (2025)

Quantitative Methods in Research Evaluation Citation Indicators, Altmetrics, and Artificial Intelligence
by: Thelwall, Mike
Published: (2024)

Research quality evaluation by AI in the era of Large Language Models: Advantages, disadvantages, and systemic effects
by: Thelwall, Mike
Published: (2025)

Prompt perturbation and fraction facilitation sometimes strengthen Large Language Model scores
by: Thelwall, Mike
Published: (2025)

Do Large Language Models know Which Published Articles have been Retracted?
by: Thelwall, Mike
Published: (2026)

Can Small and Reasoning Large Language Models Score Journal Articles for Research Quality and Do Averaging and Few-shot Help?
by: Thelwall, Mike, et al.
Published: (2025)

Will AI be overconfident about academic research findings when reliant on abstracts? (v1)
by: Thelwall, Mike
Published: (2026)

Evaluating Research Quality with Large Language Models: An Analysis of ChatGPT's Effectiveness with Different Settings and Inputs
by: Thelwall, Mike
Published: (2024)

Can ChatGPT be a good follower of academic paradigms? Research quality evaluations in conflicting areas of sociology
by: Thelwall, Mike, et al.
Published: (2025)

Organisational accounts engaged in scholarly communication on Twitter: Patterns of presence, activity and engagement
by: Zahedi, Zohreh, et al.
Published: (2026)

Which stylistic features fool ChatGPT research evaluations?
by: Kousha, Kayvan, et al.
Published: (2026)

A Global South Strategy for Evaluating Research Value with ChatGPT
by: Nunkoo, Robin, et al.
Published: (2025)

Is OpenAlex Suitable for Research Quality Evaluation and Which Citation Indicator is Best?
by: Thelwall, Mike, et al.
Published: (2025)

Research evaluation with ChatGPT: Is it age, country, length, or field biased?
by: Thelwall, Mike, et al.
Published: (2024)

Estimating the quality of academic books from their descriptions with ChatGPT
by: Thelwall, Mike, et al.
Published: (2025)

In which fields can ChatGPT detect journal article quality? An evaluation of REF2021 results
by: Thelwall, Mike, et al.
Published: (2024)

Implicit and Explicit Research Quality Score Probabilities from ChatGPT
by: Thelwall, Mike, et al.
Published: (2025)

Have LLM-associated terms increased in article full texts in all fields?
by: Thelwall, Mike, et al.
Published: (2026)

Journal Quality Factors from ChatGPT: More meaningful than Impact Factors?
by: Thelwall, Mike, et al.
Published: (2024)

Evaluating the Predictive Capacity of ChatGPT for Academic Peer Review Outcomes Across Multiple Platforms
by: Thelwall, Mike, et al.
Published: (2024)

Assessing the societal influence of academic research with ChatGPT: Impact case study evaluations
by: Kousha, Kayvan, et al.
Published: (2024)

Evaluating the quality of published medical research with ChatGPT
by: Thelwall, Mike, et al.
Published: (2024)

Large Language Models for Departmental Expert Review Quality Scores
by: Langfeldt, Liv, et al.
Published: (2026)

Science cited in policy documents: Evidence from the Overton database
by: Fang, Zhichao, et al.
Published: (2024)

(Non-)retracted academic papers in OpenAlex
by: Hauschke, Christian, et al.
Published: (2024)

Evidence for studying interactions between science and policy: An exploration of scholarly and policy references in Overton-indexed policy documents
by: Murat, Biegzat, et al.
Published: (2026)

Which international co-authorships produce higher quality journal articles?
by: Thelwall, Mike, et al.
Published: (2022)

A survey on proximity monitoring and warning in construction
by: Ding, Yuexiong, et al.
Published: (2025)