Cover Image

ChatGPT "contamination": estimating the prevalence of LLMs in the scholarly literature

Fuente: arXiv

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Author:	Gray, Andrew
Format:	Preprint
Published:	2024
Subjects:	Digital Libraries
Online Access:	Acceder al recurso
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

Similar Items

Estimating the prevalence of LLM-assisted text in scholarly writing
by: Gray, Andrew
Published: (2025)

Estimating the quality of academic books from their descriptions with ChatGPT
by: Thelwall, Mike, et al.
Published: (2025)

Which stylistic features fool ChatGPT research evaluations?
by: Kousha, Kayvan, et al.
Published: (2026)

Research evaluation with ChatGPT: Is it age, country, length, or field biased?
by: Thelwall, Mike, et al.
Published: (2024)

A Global South Strategy for Evaluating Research Value with ChatGPT
by: Nunkoo, Robin, et al.
Published: (2025)

Implicit and Explicit Research Quality Score Probabilities from ChatGPT
by: Thelwall, Mike, et al.
Published: (2025)

Can ChatGPT evaluate research quality?
by: Thelwall, Mike
Published: (2024)

Can ChatGPT evaluate research environments? Evidence from REF2021
by: Kousha, Kayvan, et al.
Published: (2025)

Evaluating the quality of published medical research with ChatGPT
by: Thelwall, Mike, et al.
Published: (2024)

How much are LLMs changing the language of academic papers after ChatGPT? A multi-database and full text analysis
by: Kousha, Kayvan, et al.
Published: (2025)

Journal Quality Factors from ChatGPT: More meaningful than Impact Factors?
by: Thelwall, Mike, et al.
Published: (2024)

Detection of metadata manipulations: Finding sneaked references in the scholarly literature
by: Besançon, Lonni, et al.
Published: (2025)

In which fields do ChatGPT scores align better than citations with research quality?
by: Thelwall, Mike
Published: (2025)

In which fields can ChatGPT detect journal article quality? An evaluation of REF2021 results
by: Thelwall, Mike, et al.
Published: (2024)

Can ChatGPT be a good follower of academic paradigms? Research quality evaluations in conflicting areas of sociology
by: Thelwall, Mike, et al.
Published: (2025)

FAIR GPT: A virtual consultant for research data management in ChatGPT
by: Shigapov, Renat, et al.
Published: (2024)

Assessing the societal influence of academic research with ChatGPT: Impact case study evaluations
by: Kousha, Kayvan, et al.
Published: (2024)

Delving into the Utilisation of ChatGPT in Scientific Publications in Astronomy
by: Astarita, Simone, et al.
Published: (2024)

Is ChatGPT Transforming Academics' Writing Style?
by: Geng, Mingmeng, et al.
Published: (2024)

Where there's a will there's a way: ChatGPT is used more for science in countries where it is prohibited
by: Bao, Honglin, et al.
Published: (2024)

Evaluating the Predictive Capacity of ChatGPT for Academic Peer Review Outcomes Across Multiple Platforms
by: Thelwall, Mike, et al.
Published: (2024)

Evaluating Research Quality with Large Language Models: An Analysis of ChatGPT's Effectiveness with Different Settings and Inputs
by: Thelwall, Mike
Published: (2024)

Sentiment Analysis of Citations in Scientific Articles Using ChatGPT: Identifying Potential Biases and Conflicts of Interest
by: Hariri, Walid
Published: (2024)

An Experiment with the Use of ChatGPT for LCSH Subject Assignment on Electronic Theses and Dissertations
by: Chow, Eric H. C., et al.
Published: (2024)

Are ChatGPT and Other Similar Systems the Modern Lernaean Hydras of AI?
by: Ioannidis, Dimitrios, et al.
Published: (2023)

Authority Signals in AI Cited Health Sources: A Framework for Evaluating Source Credibility in ChatGPT Responses
by: Jacques, Erin, et al.
Published: (2026)

Forensic Scientometrics -- An emerging discipline to protect the scholarly record
by: McIntosh, Leslie D., et al.
Published: (2024)

Requirements for a cooperative information infrastructure for the digital preservation of scholarly blogs
by: Ochsner, Catharina, et al.
Published: (2026)

A smack of all neighbouring languages: How multilingual is scholarly communication?
by: Pradier, Carolina, et al.
Published: (2025)

A bibliometric analysis of Canadian LIS scholars and practitioners' research contributions
by: Sauve, Jean-Sebastien, et al.
Published: (2025)

Quantifying Similarity: Text-Mining Approaches to Evaluate ChatGPT and Google Bard Content in Relation to BioMedical Literature
by: Klimczak, Jakub, et al.
Published: (2024)

International collaboration of Ukrainian scholars: Effects of Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine
by: Hladchenko, Myroslava
Published: (2025)

Shifting norms in scholarly publications: trends in readability, objectivity, authorship, and AI use
by: Cunningham, Padraig, et al.
Published: (2025)

Implications of Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine for the international mobility of Ukrainian scholars
by: Hladchenko, Myroslava
Published: (2026)

Organisational accounts engaged in scholarly communication on Twitter: Patterns of presence, activity and engagement
by: Zahedi, Zohreh, et al.
Published: (2026)

Big Deal cancellations and scholarly publishing: Insights from faculty and graduate student interviews
by: Hare, Madelaine, et al.
Published: (2026)

OpenAlex: Features, advantages and limitations of an open database for retrieving and analysing scholarly outputs
by: Borrego, Ángel, et al.
Published: (2025)

Access models, authorship patterns, and citation impact in Ukrainian scholarly publishing (2020-2023)
by: Hladchenko, Myroslava
Published: (2025)

An open dataset of article processing charges from six large scholarly publishers (2019-2023)
by: Butler, Leigh-Ann, et al.
Published: (2024)

The role of non-scientific factors vis-a-vis the quality of publications in determining their scholarly impact
by: Abramo, Giovanni, et al.
Published: (2024)