Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bangay, Shaun, Cardilini, Adam P. A., McKenzie, Sophie, Nicholas, Maria, Singh, Manjeet
Format: Preprint
Published: 2024
Subjects:
Online Access:https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.17243
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866911813267881984
author Bangay, Shaun
Cardilini, Adam P. A.
McKenzie, Sophie
Nicholas, Maria
Singh, Manjeet
author_facet Bangay, Shaun
Cardilini, Adam P. A.
McKenzie, Sophie
Nicholas, Maria
Singh, Manjeet
contents Educators, developers, and other stakeholders face challenges when creating, adapting, and utilizing virtual and augmented reality (XR) experiences for teaching curriculum topics. User created reviews of these applications provide important information about their relevance and effectiveness in supporting achievement of educational outcomes. To make these reviews accessible, relevant, and useful, they must be readily available and presented in a format that supports decision-making by educators. This paper identifies best practices for developing a new review ecosystem by analyzing existing approaches to providing reviews of interactive experiences. It focuses on the form and format of these reviews, as well as the mechanisms for sharing information about experiences and identifying which ones are most effective. The paper also examines the incentives that drive review creation and maintenance, ensuring that new experiences receive attention from reviewers and that relevant information is updated when necessary. The strategies and opportunities for developing an educational XR (eduXR) review ecosystem include methods for measuring properties such as quality metrics, engaging a broad range of stakeholders in the review process, and structuring the system as a closed loop managed by feedback and incentive structures to ensure stability and productivity. Computing educators are well-positioned to lead the development of these review ecosystems, which can relate XR experiences to the potential opportunities for teaching and learning that they offer.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2403_17243
institution arXiv
publishDate 2024
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Review Ecosystems to access Educational XR Experiences: a Scoping Review
Bangay, Shaun
Cardilini, Adam P. A.
McKenzie, Sophie
Nicholas, Maria
Singh, Manjeet
Computers and Society
Social and Information Networks
I.7.4; K.3.1
Educators, developers, and other stakeholders face challenges when creating, adapting, and utilizing virtual and augmented reality (XR) experiences for teaching curriculum topics. User created reviews of these applications provide important information about their relevance and effectiveness in supporting achievement of educational outcomes. To make these reviews accessible, relevant, and useful, they must be readily available and presented in a format that supports decision-making by educators. This paper identifies best practices for developing a new review ecosystem by analyzing existing approaches to providing reviews of interactive experiences. It focuses on the form and format of these reviews, as well as the mechanisms for sharing information about experiences and identifying which ones are most effective. The paper also examines the incentives that drive review creation and maintenance, ensuring that new experiences receive attention from reviewers and that relevant information is updated when necessary. The strategies and opportunities for developing an educational XR (eduXR) review ecosystem include methods for measuring properties such as quality metrics, engaging a broad range of stakeholders in the review process, and structuring the system as a closed loop managed by feedback and incentive structures to ensure stability and productivity. Computing educators are well-positioned to lead the development of these review ecosystems, which can relate XR experiences to the potential opportunities for teaching and learning that they offer.
title Review Ecosystems to access Educational XR Experiences: a Scoping Review
topic Computers and Society
Social and Information Networks
I.7.4; K.3.1
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.17243