Large Language Models Are State-of-the-Art Evaluator for Grammatical Error Correction
Fuente:
arXiv
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2024
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866911887804858368 |
|---|---|
| author | Kobayashi, Masamune Mita, Masato Komachi, Mamoru |
| author_facet | Kobayashi, Masamune Mita, Masato Komachi, Mamoru |
| contents | Large Language Models (LLMs) have been reported to outperform existing automatic evaluation metrics in some tasks, such as text summarization and machine translation. However, there has been a lack of research on LLMs as evaluators in grammatical error correction (GEC). In this study, we investigate the performance of LLMs in GEC evaluation by employing prompts designed to incorporate various evaluation criteria inspired by previous research. Our extensive experimental results demonstrate that GPT-4 achieved Kendall's rank correlation of 0.662 with human judgments, surpassing all existing methods. Furthermore, in recent GEC evaluations, we have underscored the significance of the LLMs scale and particularly emphasized the importance of fluency among evaluation criteria. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2403_17540 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2024 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Large Language Models Are State-of-the-Art Evaluator for Grammatical Error Correction Kobayashi, Masamune Mita, Masato Komachi, Mamoru Computation and Language Large Language Models (LLMs) have been reported to outperform existing automatic evaluation metrics in some tasks, such as text summarization and machine translation. However, there has been a lack of research on LLMs as evaluators in grammatical error correction (GEC). In this study, we investigate the performance of LLMs in GEC evaluation by employing prompts designed to incorporate various evaluation criteria inspired by previous research. Our extensive experimental results demonstrate that GPT-4 achieved Kendall's rank correlation of 0.662 with human judgments, surpassing all existing methods. Furthermore, in recent GEC evaluations, we have underscored the significance of the LLMs scale and particularly emphasized the importance of fluency among evaluation criteria. |
| title | Large Language Models Are State-of-the-Art Evaluator for Grammatical Error Correction |
| topic | Computation and Language |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.17540 |