Salvato in:
Dettagli Bibliografici
Autori principali: Zhou, Shijia, Weissweiler, Leonie, He, Taiqi, Schütze, Hinrich, Mortensen, David R., Levin, Lori
Natura: Preprint
Pubblicazione: 2024
Soggetti:
Accesso online:https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.17760
Tags: Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
_version_ 1866916265571909632
author Zhou, Shijia
Weissweiler, Leonie
He, Taiqi
Schütze, Hinrich
Mortensen, David R.
Levin, Lori
author_facet Zhou, Shijia
Weissweiler, Leonie
He, Taiqi
Schütze, Hinrich
Mortensen, David R.
Levin, Lori
contents In this paper, we make a contribution that can be understood from two perspectives: from an NLP perspective, we introduce a small challenge dataset for NLI with large lexical overlap, which minimises the possibility of models discerning entailment solely based on token distinctions, and show that GPT-4 and Llama 2 fail it with strong bias. We then create further challenging sub-tasks in an effort to explain this failure. From a Computational Linguistics perspective, we identify a group of constructions with three classes of adjectives which cannot be distinguished by surface features. This enables us to probe for LLM's understanding of these constructions in various ways, and we find that they fail in a variety of ways to distinguish between them, suggesting that they don't adequately represent their meaning or capture the lexical properties of phrasal heads.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2403_17760
institution arXiv
publishDate 2024
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Constructions Are So Difficult That Even Large Language Models Get Them Right for the Wrong Reasons
Zhou, Shijia
Weissweiler, Leonie
He, Taiqi
Schütze, Hinrich
Mortensen, David R.
Levin, Lori
Computation and Language
In this paper, we make a contribution that can be understood from two perspectives: from an NLP perspective, we introduce a small challenge dataset for NLI with large lexical overlap, which minimises the possibility of models discerning entailment solely based on token distinctions, and show that GPT-4 and Llama 2 fail it with strong bias. We then create further challenging sub-tasks in an effort to explain this failure. From a Computational Linguistics perspective, we identify a group of constructions with three classes of adjectives which cannot be distinguished by surface features. This enables us to probe for LLM's understanding of these constructions in various ways, and we find that they fail in a variety of ways to distinguish between them, suggesting that they don't adequately represent their meaning or capture the lexical properties of phrasal heads.
title Constructions Are So Difficult That Even Large Language Models Get Them Right for the Wrong Reasons
topic Computation and Language
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.17760