Cover Image

On The Peer Review Reports: Does Size Matter?

Fuente: arXiv

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors:	Maddi, Abdelghani, Miotti, Luis
Format:	Preprint
Published:	2024
Subjects:	Digital Libraries
Online Access:	Acceder al recurso
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

Similar Items

The Nexus of Open Science and Innovation: Insights from Patent Citations
by: Maddi, Abdelghani
Published: (2024)

Geographical and Disciplinary Coverage of Open Access Journals: OpenAlex, Scopus and WoS
by: Maddi, Abdelghani, et al.
Published: (2024)

Open Science, Open Innovation? The Role of Open Access in Patenting Activity
by: Maddi, Abdelghani, et al.
Published: (2025)

Beyond authorship: Analyzing contributions in PLOS ONE and the challenges of appropriate attribution
by: Maddi, Abdelghani, et al.
Published: (2025)

Discoverability matters: Open access models and the translation of science into patents
by: Maddi, Abdelghani, et al.
Published: (2026)

Deferred Acceptance Algorithm Improves Peer Review Process
by: Bartneck, Christoph, et al.
Published: (2026)

Gender and Discipline Shape Length, Content and Tone of Grant Peer Review Reports
by: Müller, Stefan, et al.
Published: (2025)

R-Index: A Metric for Assessing Researcher Contributions to Peer Review
by: Malekzadeh, Milad
Published: (2024)

ML Researchers Support Openness in Peer Review But Are Concerned About Resubmission Bias
by: Rao, Vishisht, et al.
Published: (2025)

Peer Reviews of Peer Reviews: A Randomized Controlled Trial and Other Experiments
by: Goldberg, Alexander, et al.
Published: (2023)

Can Large Language Models Evaluate Grant Proposal Quality? Revisiting the Wennerås and Wold Peer Review Data
by: Sandström, Ulf, et al.
Published: (2026)

Trends in Practical Student Peer-review
by: Purchase, Helen C., et al.
Published: (2024)

A Randomized Controlled Trial on Anonymizing Reviewers to Each Other in Peer Review Discussions
by: Rastogi, Charvi, et al.
Published: (2024)

ARA: Agentic Reproducibility Assessment For Scalable Support Of Scientific Peer-Review
by: Riehl, Kevin, et al.
Published: (2026)

Detecting LLM-Generated Peer Reviews
by: Rao, Vishisht, et al.
Published: (2025)

Causal Effect of Group Diversity on Redundancy and Coverage in Peer-Reviewing
by: Goyal, Navita, et al.
Published: (2024)

Identity Theft in AI Conference Peer Review
by: Shah, Nihar B., et al.
Published: (2025)

Evaluating the Predictive Capacity of ChatGPT for Academic Peer Review Outcomes Across Multiple Platforms
by: Thelwall, Mike, et al.
Published: (2024)

Commitment Checklist: Auditing Author Commitments in Peer Review
by: Chen, Chung-Chi, et al.
Published: (2026)

Automated Peer Reviewing in Paper SEA: Standardization, Evaluation, and Analysis
by: Yu, Jianxiang, et al.
Published: (2024)

Compound Deception in Elite Peer Review: A Failure Mode Taxonomy of 100 Fabricated Citations at NeurIPS 2025
by: Ansari, Samar
Published: (2026)

Rejoinder: The ICML 2023 Ranking Experiment: Examining Author Self-Assessment in ML/AI Peer Review
by: Su, Buxin, et al.
Published: (2026)

Does Open Access Foster Interdisciplinary Citation? Decomposing Open Access Citation Advantage
by: Nishikawa, Kai, et al.
Published: (2024)

Pre-review to Peer review: Pitfalls of Automating Reviews using Large Language Models
by: Akella, Akhil Pandey, et al.
Published: (2025)

Enhancing Peer Review in Astronomy: A Machine Learning and Optimization Approach to Reviewer Assignments for ALMA
by: Carpenter, John M., et al.
Published: (2024)

What Does Information Science Offer for Data Science Research?: A Review of Data and Information Ethics Literature
by: Lund, Brady D., et al.
Published: (2025)

Changes in Manuscript Length, Research Team Size, and International Collaboration in the Post-2022 Period: Evidence from PLOS ONE
by: Ben-Zion, Yossi, et al.
Published: (2026)

Technical Report: Incorporating Blogs in Pollux
by: Holtdirk, Tobias, et al.
Published: (2024)

Interactive Evidence Maps for Visualizing and Understanding Systematic Reviews
by: Mallavarapu, Aditi, et al.
Published: (2026)

Application of Module to Coding Theory: A Systematic Literature Review
by: Faldiyan, Muhammad, et al.
Published: (2024)

Large Language Models for Departmental Expert Review Quality Scores
by: Langfeldt, Liv, et al.
Published: (2026)

SWARM-SLR AIssistant: A Unified Framework for Scalable Systematic Literature Review Automation
by: Wittenborg, Tim, et al.
Published: (2026)

Requirements for a Digital Library System: A Case Study in Digital Humanities (Technical Report)
by: Kroll, Hermann, et al.
Published: (2024)

Who Are Tweeting About Academic Publications? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Altmetric Studies
by: Maleki, Ashraf, et al.
Published: (2023)

DecentPeeR: A Self-Incentivised & Inclusive Decentralized Peer Review System
by: Gruendler, Johannes, et al.
Published: (2024)

How to Find Fantastic AI Papers: Self-Rankings as a Powerful Predictor of Scientific Impact Beyond Peer Review
by: Su, Buxin, et al.
Published: (2025)

On the Alignment of Post-Publication Reviews & Bibliometric and Altmetric Impact -- A Case Study on Expert Statements from the Science Media Center Germany
by: Tunger, Dirk, et al.
Published: (2025)

Paper Copilot: Tracking the Evolution of Peer Review in AI Conferences
by: Yang, Jing, et al.
Published: (2025)

The ICML 2023 Ranking Experiment: Examining Author Self-Assessment in ML/AI Peer Review
by: Su, Buxin, et al.
Published: (2024)

The IJCNN 2025 Review Process
by: Scarpiniti, Michele, et al.
Published: (2026)