Random 3-Manifolds Have No Totally Geodesic Submanifolds

Fuente: arXiv
Enregistré dans:
Détails bibliographiques
Auteurs principaux: El-Hasan, Hasan M., Wilhelm, Frederick
Format: Preprint
Publié: 2024
Sujets:
Accès en ligne:
Tags: Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!
_version_ 1866911823757836288
author El-Hasan, Hasan M.
Wilhelm, Frederick
author_facet El-Hasan, Hasan M.
Wilhelm, Frederick
contents Murphy and the second author showed that a generic closed Riemannian manifold has no totally geodesic submanifolds, provided it is at least four dimensional. Lytchak and Petrunin established the same thing in dimension 3. For the higher dimensional result, the generic set is open and dense in the $C^{q}$--topology for any $% q\geq 2.$ In Lytchak and Petrunin's work, the generic set is a dense $G_{δ}$ in the $C^{q}$-topology for any $q\geq 2.$ Here we show that the set of such metrics on a compact $3$-manifold contains a set that is open and dense in the $C^{q}$-topology for any $q\geq 3.$
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2404_01581
institution arXiv
publishDate 2024
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Random 3-Manifolds Have No Totally Geodesic Submanifolds
El-Hasan, Hasan M.
Wilhelm, Frederick
Differential Geometry
53C20
Murphy and the second author showed that a generic closed Riemannian manifold has no totally geodesic submanifolds, provided it is at least four dimensional. Lytchak and Petrunin established the same thing in dimension 3. For the higher dimensional result, the generic set is open and dense in the $C^{q}$--topology for any $% q\geq 2.$ In Lytchak and Petrunin's work, the generic set is a dense $G_{δ}$ in the $C^{q}$-topology for any $q\geq 2.$ Here we show that the set of such metrics on a compact $3$-manifold contains a set that is open and dense in the $C^{q}$-topology for any $q\geq 3.$
title Random 3-Manifolds Have No Totally Geodesic Submanifolds
topic Differential Geometry
53C20
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.01581