Allowing humans to interactively guide machines where to look does not always improve human-AI team's classification accuracy

Fuente: arXiv
Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nguyen, Giang, Taesiri, Mohammad Reza, Kim, Sunnie S. Y., Nguyen, Anh
Format: Preprint
Published: 2024
Subjects:
Online Access:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866911846151225344
author Nguyen, Giang
Taesiri, Mohammad Reza
Kim, Sunnie S. Y.
Nguyen, Anh
author_facet Nguyen, Giang
Taesiri, Mohammad Reza
Kim, Sunnie S. Y.
Nguyen, Anh
contents Via thousands of papers in Explainable AI (XAI), attention maps \cite{vaswani2017attention} and feature importance maps \cite{bansal2020sam} have been established as a common means for finding how important each input feature is to an AI's decisions. It is an interesting, unexplored question whether allowing users to edit the feature importance at test time would improve a human-AI team's accuracy on downstream tasks. In this paper, we address this question by leveraging CHM-Corr, a state-of-the-art, ante-hoc explainable classifier \cite{taesiri2022visual} that first predicts patch-wise correspondences between the input and training-set images, and then bases on them to make classification decisions. We build CHM-Corr++, an interactive interface for CHM-Corr, enabling users to edit the feature importance map provided by CHM-Corr and observe updated model decisions. Via CHM-Corr++, users can gain insights into if, when, and how the model changes its outputs, improving their understanding beyond static explanations. However, our study with 18 expert users who performed 1,400 decisions finds no statistical significance that our interactive approach improves user accuracy on CUB-200 bird image classification over static explanations. This challenges the hypothesis that interactivity can boost human-AI team accuracy and raises needs for future research. We open-source CHM-Corr++, an interactive tool for editing image classifier attention (see an interactive demo here: http://137.184.82.109:7080/). We release code and data on github: https://github.com/anguyen8/chm-corr-interactive.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2404_05238
institution arXiv
publishDate 2024
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Allowing humans to interactively guide machines where to look does not always improve human-AI team's classification accuracy
Nguyen, Giang
Taesiri, Mohammad Reza
Kim, Sunnie S. Y.
Nguyen, Anh
Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
Human-Computer Interaction
Via thousands of papers in Explainable AI (XAI), attention maps \cite{vaswani2017attention} and feature importance maps \cite{bansal2020sam} have been established as a common means for finding how important each input feature is to an AI's decisions. It is an interesting, unexplored question whether allowing users to edit the feature importance at test time would improve a human-AI team's accuracy on downstream tasks. In this paper, we address this question by leveraging CHM-Corr, a state-of-the-art, ante-hoc explainable classifier \cite{taesiri2022visual} that first predicts patch-wise correspondences between the input and training-set images, and then bases on them to make classification decisions. We build CHM-Corr++, an interactive interface for CHM-Corr, enabling users to edit the feature importance map provided by CHM-Corr and observe updated model decisions. Via CHM-Corr++, users can gain insights into if, when, and how the model changes its outputs, improving their understanding beyond static explanations. However, our study with 18 expert users who performed 1,400 decisions finds no statistical significance that our interactive approach improves user accuracy on CUB-200 bird image classification over static explanations. This challenges the hypothesis that interactivity can boost human-AI team accuracy and raises needs for future research. We open-source CHM-Corr++, an interactive tool for editing image classifier attention (see an interactive demo here: http://137.184.82.109:7080/). We release code and data on github: https://github.com/anguyen8/chm-corr-interactive.
title Allowing humans to interactively guide machines where to look does not always improve human-AI team's classification accuracy
topic Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
Human-Computer Interaction
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.05238