Frogs, hats and common subsequences
Fuente:
arXiv
Gespeichert in:
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Veröffentlicht: |
2024
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| _version_ | 1866912283465089024 |
|---|---|
| author | Briggs, Joseph Parker, Alex Schwieder, Coy Wells, Chris |
| author_facet | Briggs, Joseph Parker, Alex Schwieder, Coy Wells, Chris |
| contents | Write $W^{(n)}$ to mean the $n$-letter word obtained by repeating a fixed word $W$ and let $R_n$ denote a uniformly random $n$-letter word sampled from the same alphabet as $W$. We are interested in the average length of the longest common subsequence between $W^{(n)}$ and $R_n$, which is known to be $γ(W)\cdot n+o(n)$ for some constant $γ(W)$. Bukh and Cox recently developed an interacting particle system, dubbed the frog dynamics, which can be used to compute the constant $γ(W)$ for any fixed word $W$. They successfully analyzed the simplest case of the frog dynamics to find an explicit formula for the constants $γ(12\cdots k)$. We continue this study by using the frog dynamics to find an explicit formula for the constants $γ(12\cdots kk\cdots 21)$. The frog dynamics in this case is a variation of the PushTASEP on the ring where some clocks are identical. Interestingly, exclusion processes with correlated clocks of this type appear to have not been analyzed before. Our analysis leads to a seemingly new combinatorial object which could be of independent interest: frogs with hats! |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2404_07285 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2024 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Frogs, hats and common subsequences Briggs, Joseph Parker, Alex Schwieder, Coy Wells, Chris Combinatorics Probability 05A19, 60J10 Write $W^{(n)}$ to mean the $n$-letter word obtained by repeating a fixed word $W$ and let $R_n$ denote a uniformly random $n$-letter word sampled from the same alphabet as $W$. We are interested in the average length of the longest common subsequence between $W^{(n)}$ and $R_n$, which is known to be $γ(W)\cdot n+o(n)$ for some constant $γ(W)$. Bukh and Cox recently developed an interacting particle system, dubbed the frog dynamics, which can be used to compute the constant $γ(W)$ for any fixed word $W$. They successfully analyzed the simplest case of the frog dynamics to find an explicit formula for the constants $γ(12\cdots k)$. We continue this study by using the frog dynamics to find an explicit formula for the constants $γ(12\cdots kk\cdots 21)$. The frog dynamics in this case is a variation of the PushTASEP on the ring where some clocks are identical. Interestingly, exclusion processes with correlated clocks of this type appear to have not been analyzed before. Our analysis leads to a seemingly new combinatorial object which could be of independent interest: frogs with hats! |
| title | Frogs, hats and common subsequences |
| topic | Combinatorics Probability 05A19, 60J10 |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.07285 |