Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2024
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.10954 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866913574824181760 |
|---|---|
| author | Powers, Albert Angelos, Philip Bond, Alexandria Farina, Emily Fredericks, Carolyn Gandhi, Jay Greenwald, Maximillian Hernandez-Busot, Gabriela Hosein, Gabriel Kelley, Megan Mourgues, Catalina Palmer, William Rodriguez-Sanchez, Julia Seabury, Rashina Toribio, Silmilly Vin, Raina Weleff, Jeremy Benrimoh, David |
| author_facet | Powers, Albert Angelos, Philip Bond, Alexandria Farina, Emily Fredericks, Carolyn Gandhi, Jay Greenwald, Maximillian Hernandez-Busot, Gabriela Hosein, Gabriel Kelley, Megan Mourgues, Catalina Palmer, William Rodriguez-Sanchez, Julia Seabury, Rashina Toribio, Silmilly Vin, Raina Weleff, Jeremy Benrimoh, David |
| contents | The mechanisms of psychotic symptoms like hallucinations and delusions are often investigated in fully-formed illness, well after symptoms emerge. These investigations have yielded key insights, but are not well-positioned to reveal the dynamic forces underlying symptom formation itself. Understanding symptom development over time would allow us to identify steps in the pathophysiological process leading to psychosis, shifting the focus of psychiatric intervention from symptom alleviation to prevention. We propose a model for understanding the emergence of psychotic symptoms within the context of an adaptive, developing neural system. We will make the case for a pathophysiological process that begins with cortical hyperexcitability and bottom-up noise transmission, which engenders inappropriate belief formation via aberrant prediction error signaling. We will argue that this bottom-up noise drives learning about the (im)precision of new incoming sensory information because of diminished signal-to-noise ratio, causing an adaptive relative over-reliance on prior beliefs. This over-reliance on priors predisposes to hallucinations and covaries with hallucination severity. An over-reliance on priors may also lead to increased conviction in the beliefs generated by bottom-up noise and drive movement toward conversion to psychosis. We will identify predictions of our model at each stage, examine evidence to support or refute those predictions, and propose experiments that could falsify or help select between alternative elements of the overall model. Nesting computational abnormalities within longitudinal development allows us to account for hidden dynamics among the mechanisms driving symptom formation and to view established symptomatology as a point of equilibrium among competing biological forces. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2404_10954 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2024 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | A computational account of the development and evolution of psychotic symptoms Powers, Albert Angelos, Philip Bond, Alexandria Farina, Emily Fredericks, Carolyn Gandhi, Jay Greenwald, Maximillian Hernandez-Busot, Gabriela Hosein, Gabriel Kelley, Megan Mourgues, Catalina Palmer, William Rodriguez-Sanchez, Julia Seabury, Rashina Toribio, Silmilly Vin, Raina Weleff, Jeremy Benrimoh, David Neurons and Cognition The mechanisms of psychotic symptoms like hallucinations and delusions are often investigated in fully-formed illness, well after symptoms emerge. These investigations have yielded key insights, but are not well-positioned to reveal the dynamic forces underlying symptom formation itself. Understanding symptom development over time would allow us to identify steps in the pathophysiological process leading to psychosis, shifting the focus of psychiatric intervention from symptom alleviation to prevention. We propose a model for understanding the emergence of psychotic symptoms within the context of an adaptive, developing neural system. We will make the case for a pathophysiological process that begins with cortical hyperexcitability and bottom-up noise transmission, which engenders inappropriate belief formation via aberrant prediction error signaling. We will argue that this bottom-up noise drives learning about the (im)precision of new incoming sensory information because of diminished signal-to-noise ratio, causing an adaptive relative over-reliance on prior beliefs. This over-reliance on priors predisposes to hallucinations and covaries with hallucination severity. An over-reliance on priors may also lead to increased conviction in the beliefs generated by bottom-up noise and drive movement toward conversion to psychosis. We will identify predictions of our model at each stage, examine evidence to support or refute those predictions, and propose experiments that could falsify or help select between alternative elements of the overall model. Nesting computational abnormalities within longitudinal development allows us to account for hidden dynamics among the mechanisms driving symptom formation and to view established symptomatology as a point of equilibrium among competing biological forces. |
| title | A computational account of the development and evolution of psychotic symptoms |
| topic | Neurons and Cognition |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.10954 |