Multi-modalities and non-commutativity/associativity in functorial linear logic: a case study
Fuente:
arXiv
Gespeichert in:
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Veröffentlicht: |
2024
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| _version_ | 1866913318746193920 |
|---|---|
| author | Olarte, Carlos Pimentel, Elaine |
| author_facet | Olarte, Carlos Pimentel, Elaine |
| contents | Similar to modal connectives, the exponential ! in intuitionistic linear logic (ILL) is not canonical, in the sense that if $i\not= j$ then $!^i F\not\equiv !^j F$. Intuitively, this means that we can mark the exponential with labels taken from a set I organized in a pre-order $\preceq$, obtaining (possibly infinitely-many) exponentials ($!^i$ for $i\in I$).
There are, however, two main differences between multi-modalities in normal modal logics and subexponentials in linear logic.
i. substructural behaviour. Subexponentials carry the possibility of having different structural behaviors;
ii. nature of modalities. Normal modal logics start from the weakest version, assuming only axiom K, then extensions are considered, by adding other axioms. Exponentials in linear logic "take for granted" the behaviors expressed by axioms T and 4.
Regarding (i), originally subexponentials could assume only weakening and contraction axioms, but later non-commutative/non-associative systems allowing commutative/ associative subexponentials were presented.
Concerning (ii), Guerrini et al unified the modal and LL approaches, with the exponentials assuming only the linear version of K, with the possibility of adding modal extensions to it. This discussion was brought to multi-modal case, where subexponentials consider not only the structural axioms for contraction and weakening, but also the subexponential version of axioms {K,4,D,T}.
In this work, we intend to join these two studies. This means that $!^{i}$ can behave classically or not, model associative and commutative systems or not, but also with exponential behaviors different from those in LL. Hence, by assigning different modal axioms one obtains, in a modular way, a class of different substructural modal logics. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2404_11445 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2024 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Multi-modalities and non-commutativity/associativity in functorial linear logic: a case study Olarte, Carlos Pimentel, Elaine Logic in Computer Science 03F52 Similar to modal connectives, the exponential ! in intuitionistic linear logic (ILL) is not canonical, in the sense that if $i\not= j$ then $!^i F\not\equiv !^j F$. Intuitively, this means that we can mark the exponential with labels taken from a set I organized in a pre-order $\preceq$, obtaining (possibly infinitely-many) exponentials ($!^i$ for $i\in I$). There are, however, two main differences between multi-modalities in normal modal logics and subexponentials in linear logic. i. substructural behaviour. Subexponentials carry the possibility of having different structural behaviors; ii. nature of modalities. Normal modal logics start from the weakest version, assuming only axiom K, then extensions are considered, by adding other axioms. Exponentials in linear logic "take for granted" the behaviors expressed by axioms T and 4. Regarding (i), originally subexponentials could assume only weakening and contraction axioms, but later non-commutative/non-associative systems allowing commutative/ associative subexponentials were presented. Concerning (ii), Guerrini et al unified the modal and LL approaches, with the exponentials assuming only the linear version of K, with the possibility of adding modal extensions to it. This discussion was brought to multi-modal case, where subexponentials consider not only the structural axioms for contraction and weakening, but also the subexponential version of axioms {K,4,D,T}. In this work, we intend to join these two studies. This means that $!^{i}$ can behave classically or not, model associative and commutative systems or not, but also with exponential behaviors different from those in LL. Hence, by assigning different modal axioms one obtains, in a modular way, a class of different substructural modal logics. |
| title | Multi-modalities and non-commutativity/associativity in functorial linear logic: a case study |
| topic | Logic in Computer Science 03F52 |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.11445 |