Evaluating AI for Law: Bridging the Gap with Open-Source Solutions

Fuente: arXiv
Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bhambhoria, Rohan, Dahan, Samuel, Li, Jonathan, Zhu, Xiaodan
Format: Preprint
Published: 2024
Subjects:
Online Access:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866911845217992704
author Bhambhoria, Rohan
Dahan, Samuel
Li, Jonathan
Zhu, Xiaodan
author_facet Bhambhoria, Rohan
Dahan, Samuel
Li, Jonathan
Zhu, Xiaodan
contents This study evaluates the performance of general-purpose AI, like ChatGPT, in legal question-answering tasks, highlighting significant risks to legal professionals and clients. It suggests leveraging foundational models enhanced by domain-specific knowledge to overcome these issues. The paper advocates for creating open-source legal AI systems to improve accuracy, transparency, and narrative diversity, addressing general AI's shortcomings in legal contexts.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2404_12349
institution arXiv
publishDate 2024
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Evaluating AI for Law: Bridging the Gap with Open-Source Solutions
Bhambhoria, Rohan
Dahan, Samuel
Li, Jonathan
Zhu, Xiaodan
Artificial Intelligence
Human-Computer Interaction
This study evaluates the performance of general-purpose AI, like ChatGPT, in legal question-answering tasks, highlighting significant risks to legal professionals and clients. It suggests leveraging foundational models enhanced by domain-specific knowledge to overcome these issues. The paper advocates for creating open-source legal AI systems to improve accuracy, transparency, and narrative diversity, addressing general AI's shortcomings in legal contexts.
title Evaluating AI for Law: Bridging the Gap with Open-Source Solutions
topic Artificial Intelligence
Human-Computer Interaction
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.12349