Data Authenticity, Consent, & Provenance for AI are all broken: what will it take to fix them?
Fuente:
arXiv
Enregistré dans:
| Auteurs principaux: | , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Publié: |
2024
|
| Sujets: | |
| Accès en ligne: | |
| Tags: |
Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!
|
| _version_ | 1866910585254313984 |
|---|---|
| author | Longpre, Shayne Mahari, Robert Obeng-Marnu, Naana Brannon, William South, Tobin Gero, Katy Pentland, Sandy Kabbara, Jad |
| author_facet | Longpre, Shayne Mahari, Robert Obeng-Marnu, Naana Brannon, William South, Tobin Gero, Katy Pentland, Sandy Kabbara, Jad |
| contents | New capabilities in foundation models are owed in large part to massive, widely-sourced, and under-documented training data collections. Existing practices in data collection have led to challenges in tracing authenticity, verifying consent, preserving privacy, addressing representation and bias, respecting copyright, and overall developing ethical and trustworthy foundation models. In response, regulation is emphasizing the need for training data transparency to understand foundation models' limitations. Based on a large-scale analysis of the foundation model training data landscape and existing solutions, we identify the missing infrastructure to facilitate responsible foundation model development practices. We examine the current shortcomings of common tools for tracing data authenticity, consent, and documentation, and outline how policymakers, developers, and data creators can facilitate responsible foundation model development by adopting universal data provenance standards. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2404_12691 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2024 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Data Authenticity, Consent, & Provenance for AI are all broken: what will it take to fix them? Longpre, Shayne Mahari, Robert Obeng-Marnu, Naana Brannon, William South, Tobin Gero, Katy Pentland, Sandy Kabbara, Jad Artificial Intelligence Computers and Society New capabilities in foundation models are owed in large part to massive, widely-sourced, and under-documented training data collections. Existing practices in data collection have led to challenges in tracing authenticity, verifying consent, preserving privacy, addressing representation and bias, respecting copyright, and overall developing ethical and trustworthy foundation models. In response, regulation is emphasizing the need for training data transparency to understand foundation models' limitations. Based on a large-scale analysis of the foundation model training data landscape and existing solutions, we identify the missing infrastructure to facilitate responsible foundation model development practices. We examine the current shortcomings of common tools for tracing data authenticity, consent, and documentation, and outline how policymakers, developers, and data creators can facilitate responsible foundation model development by adopting universal data provenance standards. |
| title | Data Authenticity, Consent, & Provenance for AI are all broken: what will it take to fix them? |
| topic | Artificial Intelligence Computers and Society |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.12691 |