Enregistré dans:
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Publié: |
2024
|
| Sujets: | |
| Accès en ligne: | https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.15115 |
| Tags: |
Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!
|
| _version_ | 1866916926243995648 |
|---|---|
| author | Settanni, Ettore |
| author_facet | Settanni, Ettore |
| contents | Principal Component Analysis and biplots are so well-established and readily implemented that it is just too tempting to give for granted their internal workings. In this note I get back to basics in comparing how PCA and biplots are implemented in base-R and contributed R packages, leveraging an implementation-agnostic understanding of the computational structure of each technique. I do so with a view to illustrating discrepancies that users might find elusive, as these arise from seemingly innocuous computational choices made under the hood. The proposed evaluation grid elevates aspects that are usually disregarded, including relationships that should hold if the computational rationale underpinning each technique is followed correctly. Strikingly, what is expected from these equivalences rarely follows without caveats from the output of specific implementations alone. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2404_15115 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2024 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Principal Component Analysis and biplots. A Back-to-Basics Comparison of Implementations Settanni, Ettore Methodology 62H25 Principal Component Analysis and biplots are so well-established and readily implemented that it is just too tempting to give for granted their internal workings. In this note I get back to basics in comparing how PCA and biplots are implemented in base-R and contributed R packages, leveraging an implementation-agnostic understanding of the computational structure of each technique. I do so with a view to illustrating discrepancies that users might find elusive, as these arise from seemingly innocuous computational choices made under the hood. The proposed evaluation grid elevates aspects that are usually disregarded, including relationships that should hold if the computational rationale underpinning each technique is followed correctly. Strikingly, what is expected from these equivalences rarely follows without caveats from the output of specific implementations alone. |
| title | Principal Component Analysis and biplots. A Back-to-Basics Comparison of Implementations |
| topic | Methodology 62H25 |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.15115 |