Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2024
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.01387 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866911863251402752 |
|---|---|
| author | Abernethy, Jacob Schapire, Robert E. Syed, Umar |
| author_facet | Abernethy, Jacob Schapire, Robert E. Syed, Umar |
| contents | A lexicographic maximum of a set $X \subseteq \mathbb{R}^n$ is a vector in $X$ whose smallest component is as large as possible, and subject to that requirement, whose second smallest component is as large as possible, and so on for the third smallest component, etc. Lexicographic maximization has numerous practical and theoretical applications, including fair resource allocation, analyzing the implicit regularization of learning algorithms, and characterizing refinements of game-theoretic equilibria. We prove that a minimizer in $X$ of the exponential loss function $L_c(\mathbf{x}) = \sum_i \exp(-c x_i)$ converges to a lexicographic maximum of $X$ as $c \rightarrow \infty$, provided that $X$ is stable in the sense that a well-known iterative method for finding a lexicographic maximum of $X$ cannot be made to fail simply by reducing the required quality of each iterate by an arbitrarily tiny degree. Our result holds for both near and exact minimizers of the exponential loss, while earlier convergence results made much stronger assumptions about the set $X$ and only held for the exact minimizer. We are aware of no previous results showing a connection between the iterative method for computing a lexicographic maximum and exponential loss minimization. We show that every convex polytope is stable, but that there exist compact, convex sets that are not stable. We also provide the first analysis of the convergence rate of an exponential loss minimizer (near or exact) and discover a curious dichotomy: While the two smallest components of the vector converge to the lexicographically maximum values very quickly (at roughly the rate $\frac{\log n}{c}$), all other components can converge arbitrarily slowly. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2405_01387 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2024 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Lexicographic Optimization: Algorithms and Stability Abernethy, Jacob Schapire, Robert E. Syed, Umar Optimization and Control A lexicographic maximum of a set $X \subseteq \mathbb{R}^n$ is a vector in $X$ whose smallest component is as large as possible, and subject to that requirement, whose second smallest component is as large as possible, and so on for the third smallest component, etc. Lexicographic maximization has numerous practical and theoretical applications, including fair resource allocation, analyzing the implicit regularization of learning algorithms, and characterizing refinements of game-theoretic equilibria. We prove that a minimizer in $X$ of the exponential loss function $L_c(\mathbf{x}) = \sum_i \exp(-c x_i)$ converges to a lexicographic maximum of $X$ as $c \rightarrow \infty$, provided that $X$ is stable in the sense that a well-known iterative method for finding a lexicographic maximum of $X$ cannot be made to fail simply by reducing the required quality of each iterate by an arbitrarily tiny degree. Our result holds for both near and exact minimizers of the exponential loss, while earlier convergence results made much stronger assumptions about the set $X$ and only held for the exact minimizer. We are aware of no previous results showing a connection between the iterative method for computing a lexicographic maximum and exponential loss minimization. We show that every convex polytope is stable, but that there exist compact, convex sets that are not stable. We also provide the first analysis of the convergence rate of an exponential loss minimizer (near or exact) and discover a curious dichotomy: While the two smallest components of the vector converge to the lexicographically maximum values very quickly (at roughly the rate $\frac{\log n}{c}$), all other components can converge arbitrarily slowly. |
| title | Lexicographic Optimization: Algorithms and Stability |
| topic | Optimization and Control |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.01387 |