Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bergstra, Jan A, Tucker, John V
Format: Preprint
Published: 2024
Subjects:
Online Access:https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.01733
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866913624135565312
author Bergstra, Jan A
Tucker, John V
author_facet Bergstra, Jan A
Tucker, John V
contents We examine the consequences of having a total division operation $\frac{x}{y}$ on commutative rings. We consider two forms of binary division, one derived from a unary inverse, the other defined directly as a general operation; each are made total by setting $1/0$ equal to an error value $\bot$, which is added to the ring. Such totalised divisions we call common divisions. In a field the two forms are equivalent and we have a finite equational axiomatisation $E$ that is complete for the equational theory of fields equipped with common division, called common meadows. These equational axioms $E$ turn out to be true of commutative rings with common division but only when defined via inverses. We explore these axioms $E$ and their role in seeking a completeness theorem for the conditional equational theory of common meadows. We prove they are complete for the conditional equational theory of commutative rings with inverse based common division. By adding a new proof rule, we can prove a completeness theorem for the conditional equational theory of common meadows. Although, the equational axioms $E$ fail with common division defined directly, we observe that the direct division does satisfies the equations in $E$ under a new congruence for partial terms called eager equality.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2405_01733
institution arXiv
publishDate 2024
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Rings with common division, common meadows and their conditional equational theories
Bergstra, Jan A
Tucker, John V
Logic in Computer Science
Symbolic Computation
We examine the consequences of having a total division operation $\frac{x}{y}$ on commutative rings. We consider two forms of binary division, one derived from a unary inverse, the other defined directly as a general operation; each are made total by setting $1/0$ equal to an error value $\bot$, which is added to the ring. Such totalised divisions we call common divisions. In a field the two forms are equivalent and we have a finite equational axiomatisation $E$ that is complete for the equational theory of fields equipped with common division, called common meadows. These equational axioms $E$ turn out to be true of commutative rings with common division but only when defined via inverses. We explore these axioms $E$ and their role in seeking a completeness theorem for the conditional equational theory of common meadows. We prove they are complete for the conditional equational theory of commutative rings with inverse based common division. By adding a new proof rule, we can prove a completeness theorem for the conditional equational theory of common meadows. Although, the equational axioms $E$ fail with common division defined directly, we observe that the direct division does satisfies the equations in $E$ under a new congruence for partial terms called eager equality.
title Rings with common division, common meadows and their conditional equational theories
topic Logic in Computer Science
Symbolic Computation
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.01733