Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Docekal, Martin, Fajcik, Martin, Smrz, Pavel
Format: Preprint
Published: 2024
Subjects:
Online Access:https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.01930
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866910277650350080
author Docekal, Martin
Fajcik, Martin
Smrz, Pavel
author_facet Docekal, Martin
Fajcik, Martin
Smrz, Pavel
contents This paper introduces OARelatedWork: a dataset for related work generation from open-access sources. It is the first large-scale multi-document summarization dataset for related work generation, containing whole related work sections and full texts of cited papers. Its validation and test splits are constructed so that every cited paper is available in full text, enabling controlled evaluation of full-text related work generation. The dataset includes 94 450 papers and 5 824 689 unique referenced papers from multiple domains. With OARelatedWork, we aim to shift the field from generating parts of related work sections from abstracts only to generating entire related work sections from all available content. We (i) benchmark a wide spectrum of models, highlighting that synthesizing massive full-text contexts remains challenge even for modern Large Language Models (LLMs): under our statement-level judge, GPT-4o-mini's evidence-grounded True rate drops from 92.9% with abstracts to 83.8% with full texts. We (ii) empirically analyze human writing behavior through a human evaluation over 40 papers and 408 factual statements, revealing that authors frequently introduce abstractive claims ungrounded in localized source texts; consequently, advanced LLMs actually surpass human baselines in strict, evidence-grounded factuality. Finally, we (iii) conduct a fine-grained meta-evaluation, revealing that standard reference-based metrics are inadequate for evaluating such long-form structured outputs, and introduce a robust statement-level evaluation framework to address this gap.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2405_01930
institution arXiv
publishDate 2024
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle OARelatedWork: A Large-Scale Dataset of Related Work Sections with Full-texts from Open Access Sources
Docekal, Martin
Fajcik, Martin
Smrz, Pavel
Computation and Language
This paper introduces OARelatedWork: a dataset for related work generation from open-access sources. It is the first large-scale multi-document summarization dataset for related work generation, containing whole related work sections and full texts of cited papers. Its validation and test splits are constructed so that every cited paper is available in full text, enabling controlled evaluation of full-text related work generation. The dataset includes 94 450 papers and 5 824 689 unique referenced papers from multiple domains. With OARelatedWork, we aim to shift the field from generating parts of related work sections from abstracts only to generating entire related work sections from all available content. We (i) benchmark a wide spectrum of models, highlighting that synthesizing massive full-text contexts remains challenge even for modern Large Language Models (LLMs): under our statement-level judge, GPT-4o-mini's evidence-grounded True rate drops from 92.9% with abstracts to 83.8% with full texts. We (ii) empirically analyze human writing behavior through a human evaluation over 40 papers and 408 factual statements, revealing that authors frequently introduce abstractive claims ungrounded in localized source texts; consequently, advanced LLMs actually surpass human baselines in strict, evidence-grounded factuality. Finally, we (iii) conduct a fine-grained meta-evaluation, revealing that standard reference-based metrics are inadequate for evaluating such long-form structured outputs, and introduce a robust statement-level evaluation framework to address this gap.
title OARelatedWork: A Large-Scale Dataset of Related Work Sections with Full-texts from Open Access Sources
topic Computation and Language
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.01930