Persona Inconstancy in Multi-Agent LLM Collaboration: Conformity, Confabulation, and Impersonation

Fuente: arXiv
Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Baltaji, Razan, Hemmatian, Babak, Varshney, Lav R.
Format: Preprint
Veröffentlicht: 2024
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
_version_ 1866929459709345792
author Baltaji, Razan
Hemmatian, Babak
Varshney, Lav R.
author_facet Baltaji, Razan
Hemmatian, Babak
Varshney, Lav R.
contents Multi-agent AI systems can be used for simulating collective decision-making in scientific and practical applications. They can also be used to introduce a diverse group discussion step in chatbot pipelines, enhancing the cultural sensitivity of the chatbot's responses. These applications, however, are predicated on the ability of AI agents to reliably adopt assigned personas and mimic human interactions. To see whether LLM agents satisfy these requirements, we examine AI agent ensembles engaged in cross-national collaboration and debate by analyzing their private responses and chat transcripts. Our findings suggest that multi-agent discussions can support collective AI decisions that more often reflect diverse perspectives, yet this effect is tempered by the agents' susceptibility to conformity due to perceived peer pressure and occasional challenges in maintaining consistent personas and opinions. Instructions that encourage debate in support of one's opinions rather than collaboration increase the rate of inconstancy. Without addressing the factors we identify, the full potential of multi-agent frameworks for producing more culturally diverse AI outputs or more realistic simulations of group decision-making may remain untapped.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2405_03862
institution arXiv
publishDate 2024
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Persona Inconstancy in Multi-Agent LLM Collaboration: Conformity, Confabulation, and Impersonation
Baltaji, Razan
Hemmatian, Babak
Varshney, Lav R.
Artificial Intelligence
Computation and Language
I.2.7
Multi-agent AI systems can be used for simulating collective decision-making in scientific and practical applications. They can also be used to introduce a diverse group discussion step in chatbot pipelines, enhancing the cultural sensitivity of the chatbot's responses. These applications, however, are predicated on the ability of AI agents to reliably adopt assigned personas and mimic human interactions. To see whether LLM agents satisfy these requirements, we examine AI agent ensembles engaged in cross-national collaboration and debate by analyzing their private responses and chat transcripts. Our findings suggest that multi-agent discussions can support collective AI decisions that more often reflect diverse perspectives, yet this effect is tempered by the agents' susceptibility to conformity due to perceived peer pressure and occasional challenges in maintaining consistent personas and opinions. Instructions that encourage debate in support of one's opinions rather than collaboration increase the rate of inconstancy. Without addressing the factors we identify, the full potential of multi-agent frameworks for producing more culturally diverse AI outputs or more realistic simulations of group decision-making may remain untapped.
title Persona Inconstancy in Multi-Agent LLM Collaboration: Conformity, Confabulation, and Impersonation
topic Artificial Intelligence
Computation and Language
I.2.7
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.03862