Cross-Care: Assessing the Healthcare Implications of Pre-training Data on Language Model Bias

Fuente: arXiv
Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chen, Shan, Gallifant, Jack, Gao, Mingye, Moreira, Pedro, Munch, Nikolaj, Muthukkumar, Ajay, Rajan, Arvind, Kolluri, Jaya, Fiske, Amelia, Hastings, Janna, Aerts, Hugo, Anthony, Brian, Celi, Leo Anthony, La Cava, William G., Bitterman, Danielle S.
Format: Preprint
Published: 2024
Subjects:
Online Access:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866909230474199040
author Chen, Shan
Gallifant, Jack
Gao, Mingye
Moreira, Pedro
Munch, Nikolaj
Muthukkumar, Ajay
Rajan, Arvind
Kolluri, Jaya
Fiske, Amelia
Hastings, Janna
Aerts, Hugo
Anthony, Brian
Celi, Leo Anthony
La Cava, William G.
Bitterman, Danielle S.
author_facet Chen, Shan
Gallifant, Jack
Gao, Mingye
Moreira, Pedro
Munch, Nikolaj
Muthukkumar, Ajay
Rajan, Arvind
Kolluri, Jaya
Fiske, Amelia
Hastings, Janna
Aerts, Hugo
Anthony, Brian
Celi, Leo Anthony
La Cava, William G.
Bitterman, Danielle S.
contents Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly essential in processing natural languages, yet their application is frequently compromised by biases and inaccuracies originating in their training data. In this study, we introduce Cross-Care, the first benchmark framework dedicated to assessing biases and real world knowledge in LLMs, specifically focusing on the representation of disease prevalence across diverse demographic groups. We systematically evaluate how demographic biases embedded in pre-training corpora like $ThePile$ influence the outputs of LLMs. We expose and quantify discrepancies by juxtaposing these biases against actual disease prevalences in various U.S. demographic groups. Our results highlight substantial misalignment between LLM representation of disease prevalence and real disease prevalence rates across demographic subgroups, indicating a pronounced risk of bias propagation and a lack of real-world grounding for medical applications of LLMs. Furthermore, we observe that various alignment methods minimally resolve inconsistencies in the models' representation of disease prevalence across different languages. For further exploration and analysis, we make all data and a data visualization tool available at: www.crosscare.net.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2405_05506
institution arXiv
publishDate 2024
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Cross-Care: Assessing the Healthcare Implications of Pre-training Data on Language Model Bias
Chen, Shan
Gallifant, Jack
Gao, Mingye
Moreira, Pedro
Munch, Nikolaj
Muthukkumar, Ajay
Rajan, Arvind
Kolluri, Jaya
Fiske, Amelia
Hastings, Janna
Aerts, Hugo
Anthony, Brian
Celi, Leo Anthony
La Cava, William G.
Bitterman, Danielle S.
Computation and Language
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly essential in processing natural languages, yet their application is frequently compromised by biases and inaccuracies originating in their training data. In this study, we introduce Cross-Care, the first benchmark framework dedicated to assessing biases and real world knowledge in LLMs, specifically focusing on the representation of disease prevalence across diverse demographic groups. We systematically evaluate how demographic biases embedded in pre-training corpora like $ThePile$ influence the outputs of LLMs. We expose and quantify discrepancies by juxtaposing these biases against actual disease prevalences in various U.S. demographic groups. Our results highlight substantial misalignment between LLM representation of disease prevalence and real disease prevalence rates across demographic subgroups, indicating a pronounced risk of bias propagation and a lack of real-world grounding for medical applications of LLMs. Furthermore, we observe that various alignment methods minimally resolve inconsistencies in the models' representation of disease prevalence across different languages. For further exploration and analysis, we make all data and a data visualization tool available at: www.crosscare.net.
title Cross-Care: Assessing the Healthcare Implications of Pre-training Data on Language Model Bias
topic Computation and Language
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.05506