PBR, nonreality and entangled measurement
Fuente:
arXiv
Gespeichert in:
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Veröffentlicht: |
2024
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| _version_ | 1866914790924877824 |
|---|---|
| author | Hofer-Szabó Gábor |
| author_facet | Hofer-Szabó Gábor |
| contents | In a recent paper, Cabbolet argues that the PBR theorem is nonreal since in the ensemble interpretation of quantum mechanics the entangled measurement used in the derivation of the PBR theorem is nonexisting. However, Cabbolet (1) doesn't provide any argument for the nonexistence of entangled measurements beyond the incompatibility of the existence of entangled measurements and the existence of $ψ$-epistemic models which we already know from the PBR theorem; and (2) he doesn't show why it is more reasonable to abandon entangled measurements instead of $ψ$-epistemic models. Hence, the PBR theorem remains intact. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2405_06526 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2024 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | PBR, nonreality and entangled measurement Hofer-Szabó Gábor Quantum Physics In a recent paper, Cabbolet argues that the PBR theorem is nonreal since in the ensemble interpretation of quantum mechanics the entangled measurement used in the derivation of the PBR theorem is nonexisting. However, Cabbolet (1) doesn't provide any argument for the nonexistence of entangled measurements beyond the incompatibility of the existence of entangled measurements and the existence of $ψ$-epistemic models which we already know from the PBR theorem; and (2) he doesn't show why it is more reasonable to abandon entangled measurements instead of $ψ$-epistemic models. Hence, the PBR theorem remains intact. |
| title | PBR, nonreality and entangled measurement |
| topic | Quantum Physics |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.06526 |