Cover Image

People cannot distinguish GPT-4 from a human in a Turing test

Fuente: arXiv

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors:	Jones, Cameron R., Bergen, Benjamin K.
Format:	Preprint
Published:	2024
Subjects:	Human-Computer Interaction Artificial Intelligence
Online Access:	Acceder al recurso
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

Similar Items

GPT-4 is judged more human than humans in displaced and inverted Turing tests
by: Rathi, Ishika, et al.
Published: (2024)

Large Language Models Pass the Turing Test
by: Jones, Cameron R., et al.
Published: (2025)

Does GPT-4 pass the Turing test?
by: Jones, Cameron R., et al.
Published: (2023)

ChatGPT-4 and other LLMs in the Turing Test: A Critical Analysis
by: Giunti, Marco
Published: (2025)

React to This (RTT): A Nonverbal Turing Test for Embodied AI
by: Zhang, Chuxuan, et al.
Published: (2025)

The Imitation Game According To Turing
by: Temtsin, Sharon, et al.
Published: (2025)

Probing the Gaps in ChatGPT Live Video Chat for Real-World Assistance for People who are Blind or Visually Impaired
by: Chang, Ruei-Che, et al.
Published: (2025)

The Moral Turing Test: Evaluating Human-LLM Alignment in Moral Decision-Making
by: Garcia, Basile, et al.
Published: (2024)

When concept-based XAI is imprecise: Do people distinguish between generalisations and misrepresentations?
by: Müller, Romy
Published: (2025)

AI model GPT-3 (dis)informs us better than humans
by: Spitale, Giovanni, et al.
Published: (2023)

Psychological and behavioural responses in human-agent vs. human-human interactions: a systematic review and meta-analysis
by: Zhou, Jianan, et al.
Published: (2025)

Can LLMs Help Improve Analogical Reasoning For Strategic Decisions? Experimental Evidence from Humans and GPT-4
by: Puranam, Phanish, et al.
Published: (2025)

GPT-4 Emulates Average-Human Emotional Cognition from a Third-Person Perspective
by: Tak, Ala N., et al.
Published: (2024)

Evaluating the Impact of a Specialized LLM on Physician Experience in Clinical Decision Support: A Comparison of Ask Avo and ChatGPT-4
by: Jung, Daniel, et al.
Published: (2024)

Using GPT-4 to guide causal machine learning
by: Constantinou, Anthony C., et al.
Published: (2024)

ArchiveGPT: A human-centered evaluation of using a vision language model for image cataloguing
by: Abele, Line, et al.
Published: (2025)

Unleashing GPT on the Metaverse: Savior or Destroyer?
by: Zhou, Pengyuan
Published: (2023)

Can ChatGPT Play the Role of a Teaching Assistant in an Introductory Programming Course?
by: Anishka, et al.
Published: (2023)

Investigating Affective Use and Emotional Well-being on ChatGPT
by: Phang, Jason, et al.
Published: (2025)

ChatGPT in Data Visualization Education: A Student Perspective
by: Kim, Nam Wook, et al.
Published: (2024)

How to Capture and Study Conversations Between Research Participants and ChatGPT: GPT for Researchers (g4r.org)
by: Kim, Jin
Published: (2025)

Role-Playing Simulation Games using ChatGPT
by: Stampfl, Rita, et al.
Published: (2024)

GPT for Games: A Scoping Review (2020-2023)
by: Yang, Daijin, et al.
Published: (2024)

Predictive Prototyping: Evaluating Design Concepts with ChatGPT
by: Yong, Hilsann, et al.
Published: (2026)

Maximizing the efficiency of human feedback in AI alignment: a comparative analysis
by: Chouliaras, Andreas, et al.
Published: (2025)

Comparing the Efficacy of GPT-4 and Chat-GPT in Mental Health Care: A Blind Assessment of Large Language Models for Psychological Support
by: Moell, Birger
Published: (2024)

Interrogating AI: Characterizing Emergent Playful Interactions with ChatGPT
by: Nikghalb, Mohammad Ronagh, et al.
Published: (2024)

On the Psychology of GPT-4: Moderately anxious, slightly masculine, honest, and humble
by: Barua, Adrita, et al.
Published: (2024)

Stable diffusion models reveal a persisting human and AI gap in visual creativity
by: Rondini, Silvia, et al.
Published: (2025)

Understanding Why ChatGPT Outperforms Humans in Visualization Design Advice
by: Ahn, Yongsu, et al.
Published: (2025)

How Culture Shapes What People Want From AI
by: Ge, Xiao, et al.
Published: (2024)

Effects of Different Prompts on the Quality of GPT-4 Responses to Dementia Care Questions
by: Li, Zhuochun, et al.
Published: (2024)

Can AI and humans genuinely communicate?
by: Bonard, Constant
Published: (2024)

If in a Crowdsourced Data Annotation Pipeline, a GPT-4
by: He, Zeyu, et al.
Published: (2024)

Integrating AI in College Education: Positive yet Mixed Experiences with ChatGPT
by: Song, Xinrui, et al.
Published: (2024)

Using customized GPT to develop prompting proficiency in architectural AI-generated images
by: Rodriguez, Juan David Salazar, et al.
Published: (2025)

Cultural Prompting Improves the Empathy and Cultural Responsiveness of GPT-Generated Therapy Responses
by: Xie, Serena Jinchen, et al.
Published: (2025)

Information That Matters: Exploring Information Needs of People Affected by Algorithmic Decisions
by: Schmude, Timothée, et al.
Published: (2024)

AccessShare: Co-designing Data Access and Sharing with Blind People
by: Kamikubo, Rie, et al.
Published: (2024)

Can AI detect pain and express pain empathy? A review from emotion recognition and a human-centered AI perspective
by: Cao, Siqi, et al.
Published: (2021)