Adversarial Robustness Guarantees for Quantum Classifiers

Fuente: arXiv
Enregistré dans:
Détails bibliographiques
Auteurs principaux: Dowling, Neil, West, Maxwell T., Southwell, Angus, Nakhl, Azar C., Sevior, Martin, Usman, Muhammad, Modi, Kavan
Format: Preprint
Publié: 2024
Sujets:
Accès en ligne:
Tags: Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!
_version_ 1866911397657444352
author Dowling, Neil
West, Maxwell T.
Southwell, Angus
Nakhl, Azar C.
Sevior, Martin
Usman, Muhammad
Modi, Kavan
author_facet Dowling, Neil
West, Maxwell T.
Southwell, Angus
Nakhl, Azar C.
Sevior, Martin
Usman, Muhammad
Modi, Kavan
contents Despite their ever more widespread deployment throughout society, machine learning algorithms remain critically vulnerable to being spoofed by subtle adversarial tampering with their input data. The prospect of near-term quantum computers being capable of running {quantum machine learning} (QML) algorithms has therefore generated intense interest in their adversarial vulnerability. Here we show that quantum properties of QML algorithms can confer fundamental protections against such attacks, in certain scenarios guaranteeing robustness against classically-armed adversaries. We leverage tools from many-body physics to identify the quantum sources of this protection. Our results offer a theoretical underpinning of recent evidence which suggest quantum advantages in the search for adversarial robustness. In particular, we prove that quantum classifiers are: (i) protected against weak perturbations of data drawn from the trained distribution, (ii) protected against local attacks if they are insufficiently scrambling, and (iii) show evidence that they are protected against universal adversarial attacks if they are sufficiently chaotic. Our analytic results are supported by numerical evidence demonstrating the applicability of our theorems and the resulting robustness of a quantum classifier in practice. This line of inquiry constitutes a concrete pathway to advantage in QML, orthogonal to the usually sought improvements in model speed or accuracy.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2405_10360
institution arXiv
publishDate 2024
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Adversarial Robustness Guarantees for Quantum Classifiers
Dowling, Neil
West, Maxwell T.
Southwell, Angus
Nakhl, Azar C.
Sevior, Martin
Usman, Muhammad
Modi, Kavan
Quantum Physics
Statistical Mechanics
Machine Learning
Chaotic Dynamics
Despite their ever more widespread deployment throughout society, machine learning algorithms remain critically vulnerable to being spoofed by subtle adversarial tampering with their input data. The prospect of near-term quantum computers being capable of running {quantum machine learning} (QML) algorithms has therefore generated intense interest in their adversarial vulnerability. Here we show that quantum properties of QML algorithms can confer fundamental protections against such attacks, in certain scenarios guaranteeing robustness against classically-armed adversaries. We leverage tools from many-body physics to identify the quantum sources of this protection. Our results offer a theoretical underpinning of recent evidence which suggest quantum advantages in the search for adversarial robustness. In particular, we prove that quantum classifiers are: (i) protected against weak perturbations of data drawn from the trained distribution, (ii) protected against local attacks if they are insufficiently scrambling, and (iii) show evidence that they are protected against universal adversarial attacks if they are sufficiently chaotic. Our analytic results are supported by numerical evidence demonstrating the applicability of our theorems and the resulting robustness of a quantum classifier in practice. This line of inquiry constitutes a concrete pathway to advantage in QML, orthogonal to the usually sought improvements in model speed or accuracy.
title Adversarial Robustness Guarantees for Quantum Classifiers
topic Quantum Physics
Statistical Mechanics
Machine Learning
Chaotic Dynamics
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.10360