Do No Harm: A Counterfactual Approach to Safe Reinforcement Learning
Fuente:
arXiv
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2024
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866911881969532928 |
|---|---|
| author | Vaskov, Sean Schwarting, Wilko Baker, Chris L. |
| author_facet | Vaskov, Sean Schwarting, Wilko Baker, Chris L. |
| contents | Reinforcement Learning (RL) for control has become increasingly popular due to its ability to learn rich feedback policies that take into account uncertainty and complex representations of the environment. When considering safety constraints, constrained optimization approaches, where agents are penalized for constraint violations, are commonly used. In such methods, if agents are initialized in, or must visit, states where constraint violation might be inevitable, it is unclear how much they should be penalized. We address this challenge by formulating a constraint on the counterfactual harm of the learned policy compared to a default, safe policy. In a philosophical sense this formulation only penalizes the learner for constraint violations that it caused; in a practical sense it maintains feasibility of the optimal control problem. We present simulation studies on a rover with uncertain road friction and a tractor-trailer parking environment that demonstrate our constraint formulation enables agents to learn safer policies than contemporary constrained RL methods. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2405_11669 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2024 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Do No Harm: A Counterfactual Approach to Safe Reinforcement Learning Vaskov, Sean Schwarting, Wilko Baker, Chris L. Machine Learning Artificial Intelligence Reinforcement Learning (RL) for control has become increasingly popular due to its ability to learn rich feedback policies that take into account uncertainty and complex representations of the environment. When considering safety constraints, constrained optimization approaches, where agents are penalized for constraint violations, are commonly used. In such methods, if agents are initialized in, or must visit, states where constraint violation might be inevitable, it is unclear how much they should be penalized. We address this challenge by formulating a constraint on the counterfactual harm of the learned policy compared to a default, safe policy. In a philosophical sense this formulation only penalizes the learner for constraint violations that it caused; in a practical sense it maintains feasibility of the optimal control problem. We present simulation studies on a rover with uncertain road friction and a tractor-trailer parking environment that demonstrate our constraint formulation enables agents to learn safer policies than contemporary constrained RL methods. |
| title | Do No Harm: A Counterfactual Approach to Safe Reinforcement Learning |
| topic | Machine Learning Artificial Intelligence |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.11669 |