Representation Noising: A Defence Mechanism Against Harmful Finetuning
Fuente:
arXiv
Salvato in:
| Autori principali: | , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Natura: | Preprint |
| Pubblicazione: |
2024
|
| Soggetti: | |
| Accesso online: | |
| Tags: |
Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
|
| _version_ | 1866913568248561664 |
|---|---|
| author | Rosati, Domenic Wehner, Jan Williams, Kai Bartoszcze, Łukasz Atanasov, David Gonzales, Robie Majumdar, Subhabrata Maple, Carsten Sajjad, Hassan Rudzicz, Frank |
| author_facet | Rosati, Domenic Wehner, Jan Williams, Kai Bartoszcze, Łukasz Atanasov, David Gonzales, Robie Majumdar, Subhabrata Maple, Carsten Sajjad, Hassan Rudzicz, Frank |
| contents | Releasing open-source large language models (LLMs) presents a dual-use risk since bad actors can easily fine-tune these models for harmful purposes. Even without the open release of weights, weight stealing and fine-tuning APIs make closed models vulnerable to harmful fine-tuning attacks (HFAs). While safety measures like preventing jailbreaks and improving safety guardrails are important, such measures can easily be reversed through fine-tuning. In this work, we propose Representation Noising (RepNoise), a defence mechanism that operates even when attackers have access to the weights. RepNoise works by removing information about harmful representations such that it is difficult to recover them during fine-tuning. Importantly, our defence is also able to generalize across different subsets of harm that have not been seen during the defence process as long as they are drawn from the same distribution of the attack set. Our method does not degrade the general capability of LLMs and retains the ability to train the model on harmless tasks. We provide empirical evidence that the efficacy of our defence lies in its ``depth'': the degree to which information about harmful representations is removed across all layers of the LLM. We also find areas where RepNoise still remains ineffective and highlight how those limitations can inform future research. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2405_14577 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2024 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Representation Noising: A Defence Mechanism Against Harmful Finetuning Rosati, Domenic Wehner, Jan Williams, Kai Bartoszcze, Łukasz Atanasov, David Gonzales, Robie Majumdar, Subhabrata Maple, Carsten Sajjad, Hassan Rudzicz, Frank Computation and Language Machine Learning Releasing open-source large language models (LLMs) presents a dual-use risk since bad actors can easily fine-tune these models for harmful purposes. Even without the open release of weights, weight stealing and fine-tuning APIs make closed models vulnerable to harmful fine-tuning attacks (HFAs). While safety measures like preventing jailbreaks and improving safety guardrails are important, such measures can easily be reversed through fine-tuning. In this work, we propose Representation Noising (RepNoise), a defence mechanism that operates even when attackers have access to the weights. RepNoise works by removing information about harmful representations such that it is difficult to recover them during fine-tuning. Importantly, our defence is also able to generalize across different subsets of harm that have not been seen during the defence process as long as they are drawn from the same distribution of the attack set. Our method does not degrade the general capability of LLMs and retains the ability to train the model on harmless tasks. We provide empirical evidence that the efficacy of our defence lies in its ``depth'': the degree to which information about harmful representations is removed across all layers of the LLM. We also find areas where RepNoise still remains ineffective and highlight how those limitations can inform future research. |
| title | Representation Noising: A Defence Mechanism Against Harmful Finetuning |
| topic | Computation and Language Machine Learning |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.14577 |