Are Long-LLMs A Necessity For Long-Context Tasks?

Fuente: arXiv
Salvato in:
Dettagli Bibliografici
Autori principali: Qian, Hongjin, Liu, Zheng, Zhang, Peitian, Mao, Kelong, Zhou, Yujia, Chen, Xu, Dou, Zhicheng
Natura: Preprint
Pubblicazione: 2024
Soggetti:
Accesso online:
Tags: Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
_version_ 1866917674167042048
author Qian, Hongjin
Liu, Zheng
Zhang, Peitian
Mao, Kelong
Zhou, Yujia
Chen, Xu
Dou, Zhicheng
author_facet Qian, Hongjin
Liu, Zheng
Zhang, Peitian
Mao, Kelong
Zhou, Yujia
Chen, Xu
Dou, Zhicheng
contents The learning and deployment of long-LLMs remains a challenging problem despite recent progresses. In this work, we argue that the long-LLMs are not a necessity to solve long-context tasks, as common long-context tasks are short-context solvable, i.e. they can be solved by purely working with oracle short-contexts within the long-context tasks' inputs. On top of this argument, we propose a framework called LC-Boost (Long-Context Bootstrapper), which enables a short-LLM to address the long-context tasks in a bootstrapping manner. In our framework, the short-LLM prompts itself to reason for two critical decisions: 1) how to access to the appropriate part of context within the input, 2) how to make effective use of the accessed context. By adaptively accessing and utilizing the context based on the presented tasks, LC-Boost can serve as a general framework to handle diversified long-context processing problems. We comprehensively evaluate different types of tasks from popular long-context benchmarks, where LC-Boost is able to achieve a substantially improved performance with a much smaller consumption of resource.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2405_15318
institution arXiv
publishDate 2024
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Are Long-LLMs A Necessity For Long-Context Tasks?
Qian, Hongjin
Liu, Zheng
Zhang, Peitian
Mao, Kelong
Zhou, Yujia
Chen, Xu
Dou, Zhicheng
Computation and Language
Artificial Intelligence
The learning and deployment of long-LLMs remains a challenging problem despite recent progresses. In this work, we argue that the long-LLMs are not a necessity to solve long-context tasks, as common long-context tasks are short-context solvable, i.e. they can be solved by purely working with oracle short-contexts within the long-context tasks' inputs. On top of this argument, we propose a framework called LC-Boost (Long-Context Bootstrapper), which enables a short-LLM to address the long-context tasks in a bootstrapping manner. In our framework, the short-LLM prompts itself to reason for two critical decisions: 1) how to access to the appropriate part of context within the input, 2) how to make effective use of the accessed context. By adaptively accessing and utilizing the context based on the presented tasks, LC-Boost can serve as a general framework to handle diversified long-context processing problems. We comprehensively evaluate different types of tasks from popular long-context benchmarks, where LC-Boost is able to achieve a substantially improved performance with a much smaller consumption of resource.
title Are Long-LLMs A Necessity For Long-Context Tasks?
topic Computation and Language
Artificial Intelligence
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.15318