Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Fortnow, Lance, Gasarch, William
Format: Preprint
Published: 2024
Subjects:
Online Access:https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.20026
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866913373097033728
author Fortnow, Lance
Gasarch, William
author_facet Fortnow, Lance
Gasarch, William
contents Let G be a context-free grammar (CFG) in Chomsky normal form. We take the number of rules in G to be the size of G. We also assume all CFGs are in Chomsky normal form. We consider the question of, given a string w of length n, what is the smallest CFG such that L(G)={w}? We show the following: 1) For all w, |w|=n, there is a CFG of size with O(n/log n) rules, such that L(G)={w}. 2) There exists a string w, |w|=n, such that every CFG G with L(G)={w} is of size Omega(n/log n). We give two proofs of: one nonconstructive, the other constructive.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2405_20026
institution arXiv
publishDate 2024
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle The CFG Complexity of Singleton Sets
Fortnow, Lance
Gasarch, William
Formal Languages and Automata Theory
F.4
Let G be a context-free grammar (CFG) in Chomsky normal form. We take the number of rules in G to be the size of G. We also assume all CFGs are in Chomsky normal form. We consider the question of, given a string w of length n, what is the smallest CFG such that L(G)={w}? We show the following: 1) For all w, |w|=n, there is a CFG of size with O(n/log n) rules, such that L(G)={w}. 2) There exists a string w, |w|=n, such that every CFG G with L(G)={w} is of size Omega(n/log n). We give two proofs of: one nonconstructive, the other constructive.
title The CFG Complexity of Singleton Sets
topic Formal Languages and Automata Theory
F.4
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.20026