Twitter should now be referred to as X: How academics, journals and publishers need to make the nomenclatural transition

Fuente: arXiv

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors:	da Silva, Jaime A. Teixeira, Nazarovets, Serhii
Format:	Preprint
Published:	2024
Subjects:	Digital Libraries
Online Access:	Acceder al recurso
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

Similar Items

APC waivers and Ukraine's publishing output in Gold OA journals: Evidence from five commercial publishers
by: Nazarovets, Serhii
Published: (2025)

(Non-)retracted academic papers in OpenAlex
by: Hauschke, Christian, et al.
Published: (2024)

The publication activity and migration trends of Ukrainian scientists in the social sciences and humanities during the first two years of the Russo-Ukrainian war
by: Nazarovets, Serhii
Published: (2024)

Visualization of rank-citation curves for fast detection of h-index anomalies in university metrics
by: Nazarovets, Serhii
Published: (2024)

Peculiarities of gender disambiguation and ordering of non-English authors' names for Economic papers beyond core databases
by: Mryglod, O., et al.
Published: (2022)

The oligopoly of academic publishers persists in exclusive database
by: van Bellen, Simon, et al.
Published: (2024)

Top performers and top journals: Persistent concentration in scientific publishing
by: Kwiek, Marek, et al.
Published: (2026)

Universal and specific features of Ukrainian economic research: publication analysis based on Crossref data
by: Mryglod, O., et al.
Published: (2021)

How open are hybrid journals included in transformative agreements?
by: Jahn, Najko
Published: (2024)

What we should learn from pandemic publishing
by: Sikdar, Satyaki, et al.
Published: (2024)

Two scholarly publishing cultures? Open access drives a divergence in European academic publishing practices
by: Kopitar, Leon, et al.
Published: (2024)

The strain on scientific publishing
by: Hanson, Mark A., et al.
Published: (2023)

Beyond authorship: Analyzing contributions in PLOS ONE and the challenges of appropriate attribution
by: Maddi, Abdelghani, et al.
Published: (2025)

Social media uptake of scientific journals: A comparison between X and WeChat
by: Cong, Ting, et al.
Published: (2025)

Academ-AI: documenting the undisclosed use of generative artificial intelligence in academic publishing
by: Glynn, Alex
Published: (2024)

Fake scientific journals are here to stay
by: Orduña-Malea, Enrique
Published: (2025)

Big Deal cancellations and scholarly publishing: Insights from faculty and graduate student interviews
by: Hare, Madelaine, et al.
Published: (2026)

Red alert: Millions of "homeless" publications in Scopus should be resettled
by: Liu, Weishu, et al.
Published: (2025)

How much are LLMs changing the language of academic papers after ChatGPT? A multi-database and full text analysis
by: Kousha, Kayvan, et al.
Published: (2025)

Web Archives for Verifying Attribution in Twitter Screenshots
by: Zaki, Tarannum, et al.
Published: (2025)

Which international co-authorships produce higher quality journal articles?
by: Thelwall, Mike, et al.
Published: (2022)

PreprintToPaper dataset: connecting bioRxiv preprints with journal publications
by: Badalova, Fidan, et al.
Published: (2025)

Regional profile of questionable publishing
by: You, Taekho, et al.
Published: (2023)

Access models, authorship patterns, and citation impact in Ukrainian scholarly publishing (2020-2023)
by: Hladchenko, Myroslava
Published: (2025)

Evaluating the quality of published medical research with ChatGPT
by: Thelwall, Mike, et al.
Published: (2024)

Distinguishing articles in questionable and non-questionable journals using quantitative indicators associated with quality
by: Stephen, Dimity
Published: (2024)

Education journal rankings: A diversity-based Author Affiliation Index assessment methodology
by: Yang, Yan-Hong, et al.
Published: (2023)

Comparison of OpenAlex and Scopus coverage of German institutions' publications in top-tier journals
by: Lovakov, Andrey, et al.
Published: (2026)

An open dataset of article processing charges from six large scholarly publishers (2019-2023)
by: Butler, Leigh-Ann, et al.
Published: (2024)

Transparency to hybrid open access through publisher-provided metadata: An article-level study of Elsevier
by: Jahn, Najko, et al.
Published: (2021)

Estimating the quality of academic books from their descriptions with ChatGPT
by: Thelwall, Mike, et al.
Published: (2025)

A multi-dimensional analysis of usage counts, Mendeley readership, and citations for journal and conference papers
by: Tian, Wencan, et al.
Published: (2024)

Estimating global article processing charges paid to six publishers for open access between 2019 and 2023
by: Haustein, Stefanie, et al.
Published: (2024)

Organisational accounts engaged in scholarly communication on Twitter: Patterns of presence, activity and engagement
by: Zahedi, Zohreh, et al.
Published: (2026)

In which fields can ChatGPT detect journal article quality? An evaluation of REF2021 results
by: Thelwall, Mike, et al.
Published: (2024)

Science for whom? The influence of the regional academic circuit on gender inequalities in Latin America
by: Pradier, Carolina, et al.
Published: (2024)

Identifying and extracting Data Access Statements from full-text academic articles
by: Pride, David, et al.
Published: (2025)

Diamond open access and open infrastructures have shaped the Canadian scholarly journal landscape since the start of the digital era
by: van Bellen, Simon, et al.
Published: (2024)

Detection of metadata manipulations: Finding sneaked references in the scholarly literature
by: Besançon, Lonni, et al.
Published: (2025)

Canadian Publications in Library and Information Science: A Database of research by LIS academics and practitioners in Canada
by: Sauvé, Jean-Sébastien, et al.
Published: (2024)